JUDGMENT M.Satyanarayana Murthy, J. - This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: "to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of respondents in not enquiring into Crime No.10/2020 by taking the 5th respondent into custody even after lapse of more than 60 days, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to conduct investigation into Cr.No.10/2020 on the file of 4th respondent." 2. The petitioner is the resident of Tirupati town living by doing contract business in and around Tirupati town, eking out his livelihood totally based on contract work. The 5th respondent, who is the resident of Bollineni Apartments made the petitioner to believe that he had Shop No.4 obtained through proceedings in Roc.No.Rev.2/126/ AEO/ P&R (TML)/ 108, dated 10.03.2009. The 5th respondent with a dishonest intention to cheat the petitioner, gave false promises that the said shop would be let out on Rs.5,000/- per day on an advance amount of Rs.30,00,000/-. One R.Ramesh, who is the friend of petitioner also joined with petitioner and both of them went to 5th respondent and paid an advance amount of Rs.25,00,000/- in the month of June, 2018 while agreeing to remaining amount at the time of handing over of the shop. 3. Even after lapse of more than six months the 5th respondent herein neither handed over the shop nor paid back the advance amount as paid by the petitioner. On 30.04.2019 the petitioner along with elders went to the 5th respondent and on questioning his acts, the 5th respondent informed that the petitioner belongs to lower caste and shop will not be given to him. On refusing the same, the 5th respondent informed that he would return the money that too handed over to Ramesh only in writing. The 5th respondent not returned the amount advanced to him, the petitioner went to the house of 5th respondent and it was informed that he was not available in the house. 4. On 18.12.2019 at about 2.00 pm the 5th respondent along with his friend came to the residence of the petitioner abused him by touching his caste, with unparliamentary language besides beating him with hands. 4. On 18.12.2019 at about 2.00 pm the 5th respondent along with his friend came to the residence of the petitioner abused him by touching his caste, with unparliamentary language besides beating him with hands. At that point of time one Vijaya Reddy, Somasekhar, Kishore and others interfered and rescued the petitioner from the hands of 5th respondent, thereupon he lodged a report which was registered as a case in Cr.No.10/2020 on the file of Tirupati (East) Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 323, 506 read with 34 IPC and 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Act, but so far no investigation is completed and the 5th respondent was not arrested by the police and requested this Court to declare the same as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 5. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home fairly submitted to this Court that entire investigation is completed on 26.03.2020 filed charge sheet on the file of IV Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge for trial of cases under SC/ST (POA) Act for various offences. Thus, the entire investigation is completed in the matter, but the Court did not register the same as Sessions Case due to Covid-19. 6. As the petitioner limited his request, questioning the action of respondent police in not completing the investigation, since the investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed, no further adjudication is required. Hence, Writ Petition is closed, at this stage itself, in view of the filing of charge sheet on 26.03.2020. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.