ORDER 1. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He further states that the offending liquor measuring 54 bulk litres has been seized from the co-accused Chotu. He further submits that the applicant has been implicated only on the basis of the 27 memorandum of the co-accused in which, the co-accused has stated that he has purchased the offending alcohol from the applicant here. Learned counsel for the State while objecting to the grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant, has submitted that though, besides the 27 memorandum of the co-accused, there is no other evidence against the applicant, the applicant has a long list of cases pending against him of similar nature and therefore it is probable that he was involved in the present case also. 2. Be that as it may, in view of the fact that besides the statement of the co-accused, there is no other evidence against the applicant here which would disclose his involvement in this case, the application is allowed subject to the furnishing of a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety of the said amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. Further, the applicant shall join investigation as and when required by the police. If there is default on the part of the applicant to join investigation, the State shall be free to move an application for cancellation of the protection given by this order. Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that all the other cases of similar nature in which the applicant was implicated, the applicant has been acquitted in those. With the above the application is finally disposed of.