Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 611 (MP)

Rajesh Bhaskar v. State Of M. P.

2020-05-21

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA

body2020
JUDGMENT 1. I.A. No. 3188/2020, application for urgent hearing, is taken up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein. 2. Applicant has been arrested on 24/2/2020 in connection with Crime No. 166/2020 registered at Police Station City Kotwali Morena, District Morena for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B off the IPC. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant Rajesh Bhaskar that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He has not committed any offence. He is in jail for the last almost three months. There is no any overt act against the applicant. There were two F.Ds. dated 20/9/2013 and 21/11/2016. As per prosecution story, the aforesaid F.Ds. were executed by the complainant on the request of the present applicant but there is no role of the present applicant in this case as the F.Ds. have been executed in favour of GGS Marketing Private Ltd. and the amount is with the company and not with the present applicant. There is no liability of the present applicant. He further undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions of guidance, circulars and directions issued by Central Government, State Government as well as Local Administration regarding measures in respect of COVID-19 Pandemic and maintain hygiene in the vicinity while keeping physical distancing. Hence, prayed for grant of bail to the applicant. 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the submission and has submitted that there are two more criminal cases registered against the present applicant and both are of serious nature as they are registered under Section 307 of the IPC as well as other sections. 5. Hence, prayed to reject the bail application of the applicant looking to his criminal background and the nature of the cases registered against him. 6. At this juncture, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that as per the order of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID 19 VIRUS IN PRISONS in SUO MOTU W.P. (C) No. 1/2020 ad interim bail for 60 days may kindly be granted to the present applicant so that he may try to get the amount of F.Ds. repaid to the complainant through GGS Marketing Pvt. Ltd. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length through VC and considered the arguments advanced by them and perused the available record. 8. repaid to the complainant through GGS Marketing Pvt. Ltd. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length through VC and considered the arguments advanced by them and perused the available record. 8. The Supreme Court by order dated 23-3-2020 passed in the case of IN RE : CONTAGION OF COVID 19 VIRUS IN PRISONS in SUO MOTU W.P. (C) No. 1/2020 has directed all the States to constitute a High Level Committee to consider the release of prisoners in order to decongest the prisons. The Supreme Court has observed as under : 'The issue of overcrowding of prisons is a matter of serious concern particularly in the present context of the pandemic of Corona Virus (COVID 19). Having regard to the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it has become imperative to ensure that the spread of the Corona Virus within the prisons is controlled. We direct that each State/Union Territory shall constitute a High Powered Committee comprising of (i) Chairman of the State Legal Services Committee, (ii) the Principal Secretary (Home/Prison) by whatever designation is known as, (ii) Director General of Prison(s), to determine which class of prisoners can be released on parole or an interim bail for such period as may be thought appropriate. For instance, the State/Union Territory could consider the release of prisoners who have been convicted or are under trial for offences for which prescribed punishment is up to 7 years or less, with or without fine and the prisoner has been convicted for a lesser number of years than the maximum. It is made clear that we leave it open for the High Powered Committee to determine the category of prisoners who should be released as aforesaid, depending upon the nature of offence, the number of years to which he or she has been sentenced or the severity of the offence with which he/she is charged with and is facing trial or any other relevant factor, which the Committee may consider appropriate." 9. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting on merits of the case, prayer for ad interim bail for a period of 60 days is allowed. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail for a temporary period of 60 days from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rs. It is directed that the applicant be released on bail for a temporary period of 60 days from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.75,000/- (Rs. Seventy Five Thousand Only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate of the concerned district. Chief Judicial Magistrate shall ensure that after furnishing bail, the bail papers are sent to the Court concerned. The applicant shall surrender before the trial Court just after completion of 60 days from the date of release on bail. The intimation regarding surrender of the applicant be furnished to this Court. In case of failure to comply the order, this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled. 10. In view of COVID-19 pandemic, the Jail Authorities are directed that before releasing the applicants, their Corona Virus test shall be conducted and if applicant is found negative, then the concerned local administration shall make necessary arrangements for sending the applicant to his house, and if he is found positive then the applicant shall be immediately sent to concerning hospital for her/his treatment as per medical norms. If the applicant is fit for release and if he is in a position to make his personal arrangements, then he shall be released only after taking due travel permission from local administration. After release, the applicant is further directed to strictly follow all the instructions which may be issued by the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration for combating the Covid19. If it is found that the applicant has violated any of the instructions (whether general or specific) issued by the Central Govt./State Govt. or Local Administration, then this order shall automatically lose its effect, and the Local Administration/Police Authorities shall immediately take him in custody and would sent him to the same jail from where he was released. 11. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-- 1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by her; 2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be; 3. 11. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the applicant:-- 1. The applicant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by her; 2. The applicant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be; 3. The applicant will not indulge herself/himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused; 5. The applicant will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; 6. The applicant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be; and 7. The applicant will inform the SHO of concerned police station about him/his residential address in the said area and it would be the duty of the Public Prosecutor to send E-copy of this order to SHO of concerned police station for information. 12. The application is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the appellant to file afresh application for regular bail after the period of 60 days, if so advised. E- copy o f this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance. Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.