Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 618 (RAJ)

Vishal Singh @ Jeetu v. State of Rajasthan

2020-09-03

SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

body2020
JUDGMENT Satish Kumar Sharma, J. - The applicant has filed this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C in FIR No.149/2008 registered at Police Station Badi, District Dholpur for the offence under Section 216-A and Section 11 of R.D.A. Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. 3. Lerned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is facing trial for the bailable offence but for the absence of 11 years, he is in custody for more than eight months. In future, he will regularly attend the Court for trial, therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Keeping in view the nature of offence for which accused is facing trial and the period of custody, the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused applicant- Vishal Singh @ Jeetu S/o Shri Kanhaiya be released on bail provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs.One lac) together with two sureties of the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs.Fifty Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.