Research › Search › Judgment

Telangana High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 72 (TS)

Mohd Hissam Uddin Ilyas v. State Of Telangana

2020-01-21

G.SRI DEVI

body2020
JUDGMENT G.Sri Devi, J. - This Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is filed by the petitioners-A1 to A9 to quash the proceedings in connection with crime No.270 of 2019 on the file of the SHO, Charminar Women Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406 and 506 IPC and 4 and 6 of D.P. Act and to stay all further proceedings in the said crime. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State. 3. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have not committed any of the offences as alleged in the complaint. He further submits that the 2nd respondent/complainant filed the present complaint with false and frivolous allegations and the present F.I.R. is liable to be quashed. 4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for quashing of the FI.R. and submits that the contents of the F.I.R. clearly disclose cognizable offence and that the F.I.R., in the present case, lodged by the 2nd respondent/complainant cannot be quashed. 5. After considering the various decisions including the decision of STATE OF HARYANA V BHAJAN LAL, 1992 SCC(Cri) 426 I am of the view that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest of the petitioner unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernable from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the police to investigate a case. From a perusal of the F.I.R., prima facie, it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence, no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying arrest of the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.