Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 736 (MP)

Adarsh Dubey v. Board of Secondary Education, Bhopal

2020-07-27

B.K.SHRIVASTAVA, SANJAY YADAV

body2020
ORDER 1. The petitioner in the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a mandamus to the effect that answer script of subjects 1. Hindi (Special), 2. General English and 3. Element of Science and Mathematics useful for Agriculture of Class XII (10+2) Board of Secondary Education Madhya Pradesh Examination 2019, conducted by the respondents be revalued through subject expert. 2. The case of the petitioner is that she appeared in Higher Secondary school Certificate Examination-Class XIIth conducted by Board of Secondary Education in the year 2019 and is awarded less marks in the above mentioned subjects. 3. In the backdrop of these submissions petitioner seeks direction for revaluation. The issue as to revaluation of answer script in case where regulation does not provide for as in the present case is no more res integra and has been settled at rest by the decision rendered by the Supreme Court in the case of Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Education and another v. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth and others: AIR 1984 SC 1543 , M.P. Board of Secondary Education and another v. Ku. Vinita Rupra, 1998 (1) MPLJ 595 and The Secretary, All India Pre-Medical/Pre-Dental Examination, C.B.S.E and ors. v. Khushboo Shrivastava & ors. - Civil Appeal No. 7024 of 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) NO. 10600 of 2009) decided on 17th August 2011 as well as judgment rendered by a Division Bench in Neha Indurkhya v. M.P. Board of Secondary Education: (2003) 2 Vidhi Bhasvar 144 = (2003) 3 MPLJ 368 and in Pranshu Indurkhya (Minor) v. State of M.P. and others: 2005 (2) JLJ 216 = 2005 (2) MPHT 95 (DB). 4. In the case at hand, having failed to demonstrate any negligence on the part of the examiner no direction can be issued to the respondents to reexamine the answer sheet of the petitioner. 5. In view whereof petition fails and is hereby dismissed. However, no costs.