ORDER 1. The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition stating that his daughter is in illegal confinement of respondent No.4 who is having criminal record. 2. Notices were issued and the State has produced the corpus. The corpus namely Pratibha is well educated person. She is aged about 30 years and in open Court, she has categorically stated before this Court that she wants to live with respondent No.4 and does not want to go with her father. 3. Learned Dy. Advocate General has also interacted with the corpus and she has categorically stated that she is not in illegal confinement and she wants to live with respondent No.4. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated before this Court that respondent No.4 is a married person who is having criminal track record. This Court is dealing with the writ petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus and the corpus produced before this Court has categorically stated before this Court she is happily residing with respondent No.4. 5. Even, the Sub-Inspector, who was present before this Court has stated that the statement of the corpus has been recorded and in her statements, she has stated that she wants to live with respondent No.4. and does not want to go with her father. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of. 7. However, It is made clear that this Court has neither observed anything in response to the first marriage of the respondent No.4 nor has put a seal of approval in respect of the relationship between respondents No.4 and 5. The order passed by this is confined only to the extent the habeas Corpus writ petition is concerned.