Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 84 (GAU)

Aminul Hoque v. State Of Assam

2020-01-27

MIR ALFAZ ALI

body2020
JUDGMENT 1. This application under Section 439 Cr.PC , has been filed praying for bail of the petitioner, namely, Md. Aminul Hoque, who is in detention in connection with Mangaldoi P.S. Case No. 645/2019 (GR No. 2468/2019) under Section 406/420/468/471 IPC R/W Section 66(D) of I.T. Act. 2. Heard Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel and Mr. T.K. Mishra, learned Addl. P.P. for the respondent. 3. Perused the FIR and the documents annexed with the petition. 4. The allegation in the FIR was that one Rejaul Karim created an unauthorized ID in PM-KISAN Portal in Darrang district and uploaded 8458 numbers of beneficiaries therein. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main accused, named in the FIR has already been enlarged on bail and the petitioner has been in custody since 29.12.2019. 6. Having considered the allegation made in the FIR and that the principal accused named in the FIR has already been granted bail, further custodial detention of the petitioner is not considered necessary in the interest of investigation. Accordingly, the petitioner is allowed to be enlarged on bail of Rs. 20,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Darrang, Mangaldoi, subject, of course, to the following conditions: 1. The accused petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation as and when required; 2. The accused petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts either to the Court or to any police officer. 3. The accused petitioner shall not commit any similar offence, of which he is accused or suspected commission. 7. Bail application is disposed of. Return the case diary.