JUDGMENT : HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the respondents had imposed upon the petitioner punishment of stoppage of his two increments without cumulative effect and withheld increments were to be restored in the year, 2019 i.e. much before the petitioner had retired after attained the age of superannuation, but the same were not restored to the petitioner due to which, the petitioner had been caused prejudice as the pay of the petitioner was not properly fixed at the time of his retirement and even the retiral benefits of the petitioner have not been fixed correctly due to the said inaction on the part of the respondents. 2. The prayer of the petitioner is for directing the respondents to re-fix the salary of the petitioner after the punishment is over and thereafter, compute and grant the petitioner the pensionary benefits alongwith arrears and interest. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that for the relief, which is being claimed in the present writ petition, the petitioner has served the respondents with legal notice dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure P-7) which is still pending consideration with the respondents and the petitioner will be satisfied, at this stage, in case a time bound direction is issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the legal notice and pass an appropriate speaking order. 4. In view of the request made, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the petitioner, the respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the legal notice dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure P-7) by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. Present writ petition stands disposed of.