ORDER : 1. The Civil Revision has been filed against the order of the return, dated 04.10.2016 made in unnumbered O.S. No........of 2016 on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur. 2. I heard Mr. P. Arun Jayatram, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner and perused the material documents available on record. 3. The revision petitioner herein has filed a suit in unnumbered O.S. No........of 2016 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Thanjavur, for recovery of money and the same was returned on 04.10.2016. Against the same, the instant Civil Revision Petition is filed. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner that the Court below misconstrued the relief claimed in the suit and failed to consider that the petitioner herein filed suit for recovery of money. It is further contended that the cause of action has been aroused within the jurisdiction of this Court. It is further contended that the Court below has failed to consider that Section 16 of C.P.C. is not application to the present case, the petitioner herein has not filed suit for recovery of the immovable property and filed suit for recovery of money and paid Court fee under Section 22 of the Tamil Nadu suit valuation and Court Fees Act and the order of the Court below is liable to be set aside by this Court. 5. The revision petitioner/plaintiff had filed a suit for recovery of money towards rental deposit amount, excess payment of rent and amount spent towards renovation. The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur has returned the plaint as the property regarding which the plaintiff paid the rent and now seeking refund of rents situated within the jurisdiction of Kumbakonam. Therefore, returned for presented before the concerned Court. As per averments in plaint, the suit property belonged to defendants and let out to plaintiff for running the school. The prayer sought for by the revision petitioner herein before this Court below is purely a money suit. 6. Section 16 of the Civil Procedure Code is extracted hereunder: “Section 16 suits to be instituted where subject matter situate. Subject to the pecuniary or other limitations prescribed by any law, suits: (a) for the recovery of immovable property with or without rent or profits. (b) for the partition of immovable property. 6. Section 16 of the Civil Procedure Code is extracted hereunder: “Section 16 suits to be instituted where subject matter situate. Subject to the pecuniary or other limitations prescribed by any law, suits: (a) for the recovery of immovable property with or without rent or profits. (b) for the partition of immovable property. (c) for foreclosure, sale or redemption in the case of mortgage of or charge upon immovable property. (d) for compensation for wrong to immovable property. (e) for the recovery of immovable property actually under distrait or attachment shall be instituted in the Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the property is situate.” As per Section 16 of the Civil Procedure Code, both defendants are residing in Thanjavur. The suit is not related to public trust and relating to immovable property. Therefore, the suit is maintainable before the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur. 7. Finally, the Civil Revision Petition is allowed. The learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. No costs. The Registry is directed to return the original plaint to the learned counsel for the petitioner.