Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2021 DIGILAW 1753 (RAJ)

Kaluram Meena v. State of Rajasthan

2021-09-17

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

body2021
JUDGMENT Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J. - This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.200/2020 registered at Police Station Tunga, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence under Section(s) 354, 354B, 354C & 506 of IPC and Section 66E of I.T. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case. He submitted that in pursuance of direction of this Court dated 10.09.2021, he has joined the investigation, has co-operated therein and his custodial interrogation is not warranted. He, therefore, prayed for release of the petitioner on pre-arrest bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the 4. learned counsel for the petitioner, the nature of allegation against him, the material contained in the case diary especially the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. which is bereft of any allegation against the petitioner; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner in connection with afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station the petitioner Kaluram Meena S/o Shri Budhinarayan Meena shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.