JUDGMENT Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-Insurance company against judgment and award dated 18.04.2016 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Barmer in M.A.C.T. Case No.638/2015, whereby, the learned Tribunal after framing the issues, evaluating the evidence on record and hearing the learned counsel for the parties decided the claim petition of the respondent-claimant and awarded a sum of Rs.3,58,639/- in favour of the claimant on account of the injuries suffered by Purkha Ram in the accident which occurred on 12.01.2014. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the only ground raised in the appeal preferred by the Insurance Company is against the finding of Tribunal on Issue No.3. He fairly submits that issue raised in the present appeal does not survive in the light of the judgment of Hon’ble the Supreme Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan V/s Oriental Insurance Company Limited reported in (2017) 14 SCC 663 , wherein it was held that if the vehicle is weighing less than 7500kg., whether the driver of the said vehicle was holding the requisite licence to drive the transport vehicle or not, is of no consequences. If a driver is holding a driving licence to drive Light Motor Vehicle and there is no endorsement to the effect to drive the transport vehicle, will not dis-entitle the claimant and it will not be a ground to deny the claim of the claimants by the Insurance Company. 4. The appeal being bereft of merit, is hereby dismissed in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan (supra).