JUDGMENT : VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J. 1. This application has been filed for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. The impugned judgment was passed on 15.1.2018, whereby judgment dated 27.10.2016 passed by trial Court, dismissing the suit of the applicant filed for declaration and alternatively for permanent prohibitory injunction qua suit property, was affirmed by learned District Judge, Solan, in Civil Appeal preferred by the applicant. Present appeal has been filed on 9.10.2020. 3. Taking into consideration order passed by the Supreme Court in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020, after excluding the time from 15.3.2020 till filing of the appeal, i.e. 9.10.2020, it has been found that appeal is barred by 1 year 10 months and 27 days. 4. It is stated in the application that copy of impugned judgment was received on 6.3.2018. It is evident from the stamp of Copying Agency that certified copy of impugned judgment was applied on 24.1.2018 and it was complete for delivery on 23.2.2018. However, it has been received in March, 2020. Be that as it may, it is a fact that present application has been preferred on 9.10.2020. Reasons disclosed, for not filing appeal for almost 2 years, is that during white wash in the house of applicant in March, 2018, copy of judgment was misplaced and it was not traceable and it is only on 15.3.2020 copy was found amongst other papers in another Almirah of the house and thereafter applicant had immediately consulted the counsel representing him in District Court, Solan, who has advised him to file appeal by stating the aforesaid facts for condonation of delay. 5. Possibility of misplacing the copy of impugned judgment cannot be ruled outrightly. 5. Possibility of misplacing the copy of impugned judgment cannot be ruled outrightly. However, conduct of the applicant indicates that he was not interested in contesting the case for almost 2 years because when copy was misplaced in the month of March, 2018 and it was not available with him, then he had to make an endevour to obtain another copy but there is nothing on record to point out any reason about any such attempt made by applicant or for not making such effort by applicant to obtain another copy of the judgment by contacting the Advocate representing him before District Judge, Solan, so as to assail the said judgment, rather, as claimed, applicant kept on sleeping till the copy was traced in the month of March, 2020, meaning thereby, had it not been traced in March, 2020, appeal would not have been filed even till date. The applicant has not taken any overt act to assail the impugned judgment within reasonable period. 6. In the aforesaid circumstances, I find that there is no reasonable ground or sufficient cause which prevented the applicant from filing the appeal within time. Therefore, the application for condonation of delay for want of sufficient cause is dismissed.