Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2021 DIGILAW 2379 (RAJ)

Chailu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

2021-12-20

VIJAY BISHNOI

body2021
JUDGMENT Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 2. The petitioner(s) has/have been arrested in FIR No.107/2021 of Police Station Sri Balaji, Distt. Nagaur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 143, 341, 323, 365, 307, 308/34 IPC. He/she/they has/have preferred this/these bail application(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that allegation of attemting to commit murder of the complainant, levelled against the petitioners, is absolutely false. It is argued that as a matter of fact, a minor dispute arose between the parties, in which, the complainant had received simple injuries. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. 5 .Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, after going through the case diary and keeping in view the fact that the injuries, for which, X-ray was conducted are simple in nature, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. Accordingly, this/these bail application(s) filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is/are allowed and it is directed that petitioner(s) ? (1) Chailu Singh S/o Sh. Prahlad Singh, Shrawan Singh S/o Laxman Singh and (3) Mahendra Singh S/o Prahlad Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.107/2021 of Police Station Sri Balaji, Distt. Nagaur provided he/she/they execute(s) a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his/her/their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.