K. Pushparaj v. Secretary, Industries (MMC-2) Department, Chennai
2021-10-07
K.MURALI SHANKAR, M.DURAISWAMY
body2021
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : M. Duraiswamy, J. (Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 3 and 4 from granting any permit to quarry gravel sand in Sivagangai District and directing the respondents 1 to 11 to initiate appropriate action against the respondents 12 to 21 for unlawful and excess quarrying of gravel sand within the time stipulated by this Court.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has also given a letter to the Registry, for listing the matter under the caption 'for withdrawal'. Accordingly, the Writ Petition has been listed today under the caption 'for withdrawal'. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. This Court by order, dated 02.03.2020, appointed Mr. K. Gurunathan as Advocate Commissioner, to inspect every locations/quarrying site, that was leased to each of the respondents 12 to 21 for exploiting minerals in the respective sites. 4. The District Collector, ivagangai was directed to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as initial remuneration and the Division Bench has also made it clear that this Court will finalise the actual remuneration, after some time. 5. Though the Division Bench had passed the order on 02.03.2020 itself, the District Collector, Sivagangai, has not complied with the directions of the Division Bench of this Court so far. 6. Mr. K. Gurunathan, learned Advocate Commissioner submitted that the District Collector, Sivagangai has not disbursed the initial remuneration till today. Now that the petitioner has withdrawn the Writ Petition and that the learned Advocate Commissioner submitted that he has inspected the site on three occasions. 7. In view of the submission made by the learned Advocate Commissioner, we direct the District Collector, Sivagangai, the third respondent in the Writ Petition, to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- to the Advocate Commissioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. Mr. P. Thilak Kumar, learned Government Pleader is directed to file a memo, with regard to the payment of the remuneration to the Advocate Commissioner in two weeks' time. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed.