Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2021 DIGILAW 3363 (MAD)

R. Siva v. Union Territory of Puducherry Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Puducherry

2021-12-01

MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, P.D.AUDIKESAVALU

body2021
JUDGMENT MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, J. (Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of (i) a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of Impugned Notifications in G.O.Ms.No.51/LAS/2021 Puducherry dated 06.10.2021 and in G.O.Ms.No.52/LAS/2021 Puducherry dated 06.10.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent and signed by the 5th respondent herein culminating into consequential impugned Notifications in No.131/SEC/CE/Res-M/E4/2021-22/914 dated 07.10.2021 and No.1-32/SEC/CE/Res-P/E4/2021-22/915 dated 07.10.2021 issued by the 3rd respondent herein, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents herein to conduct Elections for local bodies with reservations for Backward Class and Schedule Tribes expeditiously (WP.No.22288 of 2021); (ii) a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of Impugned Notifications in G.O.Ms.No.51/LAS/2021 dated 06.10.2021 and in G.O.Ms.No.52/LAS/2021 dated 06.10.2021 issued by the 2nd Respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondents to conduct election for Local Bodies after providing reservation for Backward Class and Scheduled Tribes (WP.No.22289 of 2021); and (iii) a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records pertaining to the impugned G.O.Ms.No.51/LAS/2021 and G.O.Ms.No. 52/LAS/2021 dated 06.10.2021 issued by the 4th respondent and the consequential impugned Election Notification dated 07.10.2021 vide No.1-31/SEC/CE/Res-M/E4/2022-22/914 and the impugned Press Release dated 08.10.2021 vide No.1-33/SEC/CE/E1/2021-22/930 issued by the 3rd Respondent, quash the same and further direct the respondents to provide adequate reservation for Backward Class and Schedule Tribe duly following the procedures contemplated under the Puducherry Municipalities Act- 1973 and in adherence to Article 243-S and Article 243-T(6) of The Constitution of India and make necessary notifications for the municipal elections in the Union Territory of Puducherry (WP. No.22301 of 2021).) 1. After arguing the writ petitions for some length, the respective learned counsel appearing for the petitioners pray for withdrawal of the writ petitions with liberty to approach the Apex Court under Article 32 of The Constitution of India. 2. It is under the circumstances that in respect of the issue pertaining to election to municipalities and panchayats in the Union Territory of Puducherry, the Apex Court is seized of the matter and directions have been issued to the Election Commission to hold the elections within the time specified therein. The Election Commission also issued Notifications to hold the elections. 3. The matter has complexity in a view that as per the Constitutional provisions under Article 243D(1) and (6), the Government has taken a decision to provide reservation. The Election Commission also issued Notifications to hold the elections. 3. The matter has complexity in a view that as per the Constitutional provisions under Article 243D(1) and (6), the Government has taken a decision to provide reservation. But, it should be in compliance of the decision of the Apex Court in the case of K.Krishna Murthy Vs. Union of India [ 2010 (7) SCC 202 ]. In view of the aforesaid, parties submit that entire matter is required to be taken before the Apex Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners pray to extend the interim order for a period of two weeks, so that the parties may approach the Apex Court in the meanwhile. 5. As prayed, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. The prayer for extension of interim order is not opposed by any of the parties. Accordingly, the interim order passed by this Court on 11.10.2021 shall continue for a period of two weeks from today. Liberty is granted to the petitioners as well as any other party so interested to approach the Apex Court. Consequently, all connected pending WMPs are also dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.