JUDGMENT : Re: Crl. Misc. Application No. 68176 of 2006 (Under Section 5 of Limitation Act). 1. None has appeared on behalf of the applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State/Opposite Party. 2. Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 3. There is delay of 821 days in filing the present and none has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application moreover grounds shown in the affidavit are not sufficient to condone the delay caused in filing the revision. 4. Accordingly, the delay condonation application is rejected. Order on Memo of Revision. 5. Since delay condonation application is rejected, consequently the revision is also dismissed. Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.