Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2021 DIGILAW 727 (UTT)

State Of Uttarakhand v. Vinod Kumar And

2021-12-20

NARAYAN SINGH DHANIK, RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN

body2021
JUDGMENT Raghvendra Singh Chauhan, CJ. - Since sufficient cause has been shown by the appellants for the delay in preferring the present Special Appeals, the delay is hereby condoned by this Court. Delay Condonation Applications are disposed of. 2. Both the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue raised in this Special Appeal has already been decided by this Court in Special Appeal No.214 of 2020 by judgment dated 22.11.2021. 3. The issue raised before the learned Coordinate Bench was whether the past services rendered by the employees in the Uttar Pradesh Basic Education Board should be added to the period for receiving the benefit of A.C.P., or not? The said issue was already decided by this Court in the case of Beer Singh Bhandari v. State of Uttarakhand & others, [Writ Petition (S/S) No. 270 of 2009, decided on 23.12.2009], and in the case of Bachendra Prasad Kanswal & others v. State of Uttarakhand, [Writ Petition (S/S) No.928 of 2012, decided on 09.01.2017]. Therefore, the Special Appeal No. 214 of 2020 was dismissed by this Court by its judgment dated 22.11.2021. 4. Since the present Special Appeals are squarely covered by the said judgment, the present Special Appeals are also, hereby, dismissed. 5. No order as to cost.