vkns'k 1- ;g fuxjkuh vij vk;qDr] pacy laÒkx] eqjSuk d¢ çdj.k Øekad 00288@2017&18@vŒekŒ esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-12-2017 d¢ fo#) eŒçŒ Òw&jktLo lafgrk] 1959 ¼ftls vkxs lafgrk dgka tk,xk dh èkkjk 50 d¢ rgr is'k dh xà gSA 2- çdj.k dh i`"BÒwfe ;g gS fd vkosndx.k fuoklh ÒViqjk rglhy ygkj }kjk rglhynkj ygkj d¢ le{k vkosnu çLrqr fd;k x;k fd e©tk ÒViqjk dh fLFkfr Òwfe vkjkth 383 jdok 0-510] 384 feuŒ jdok 0-080] 385 feuŒ 1 jdok 0-120] 389 jdok 0-510] 390 jdok 0-200] 419 feuŒ 1 jdok 0-690] 694 feuŒ 2 jdok 0-900 gsDV;j Òwfe ¼ftls vkxs ç'ukèkhu Òwfe dgk tk,xk½ dk ukekarj.k olh;rdrkZ enu e¨gu flag r¨ej iq= egkjkt flag r¨ej }kjk mud¢ gd esa fu"ikfnr olh;rukek fnukad 30-12-2015 d¢ vkèkkj ij olh;rdrkZ dh e`R;q fnukad 10-8-2016 d¨ g¨ tkus d¢ i'pkr~ fd;k tk,A rglhynkj ygkj }kjk fnukad 20-7-2017 d¨ vkns'k ikfjr dj e`rd enu e¨gu flag r¨ej iq= egkjkt flag r¨ej d¢ LFkku ij mudh iRuh Jherh deys'k flag r¨ej ,oa mudh iq=h uhye iRuh vfer flag Òn©fj;k d¢ uke ukekarj.k fd, tkus d¢ vkns'k fn, x,A rglhynkj] ygkj d¢ vkns'k d¢ fo#) vkosndx.k }kjk vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh] vuqÒkx] ygkj ftyk fÒ.M d¢ le{k vihy çLrqr dh xÃA vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh }kjk fnukad 7-11-2017 d¨ vkns'k ikfjr dj vihy vLohdkj dh xÃA vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh d¢ vkns'k d¢ fo#) vkosnd }kjk vij vk;qDr] pacy laÒkx] eqjSuk d¢ le{k f}rh; vihy çLrqr dh xÃA vij vk;qDr] eqjSuk }kjk fnukad 1-12-2017 d¨ vkns'k ikfjr dj f}rh; vihy fujLr dh xÃA vij vk;qDr] d¢ blh vkns'k ls ifjosfnr g¨dj ;g fuxjkuh bl U;k;ky; d¢ le{k çLrqr dh xà gSA 3- vkosnd vfÒÒk"kd dk eq[; :i ls ;g rdZ gS fd e`rd enu e¨gu flag r¨ej }kjk fnukad 30-12-2015 d¨ vkosnd d¢ gd esa olh;rukek fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k FkkA olh;rdrkZ ml fnukad d¨ LoLF; o fPkr voLFkk esa Fks v©j mUg¨aus iढ fy[kdj l¨p le>dj u¨Vjh d¢ le{k olh;r ij vius gLrk{kj fd, FksA fnukad 10-8-2016 d¨ olh;rdrkZ dh e`R;q g¨ xÃA olh;rukek d¢ lkf{k;¨a fu'py dqekj ,oa jkeçrki flag d¢ dFku¨a ls mDr olh;rukek fl) fd;k x;kA mudk ;g Òh rdZ gS fd e`rd enue¨gu flag r¨ej dh olh;r d¢ vkèkkj ij vkosnd ukekarj.k djkus dk vfèkdkj Fkk] ijarq rglhy U;k;ky; }kjk ;g vknsf'kr fd;k x;k fd olh;rdrkZ d¢ iq=h ,oa iRuh thfor g¨us ls mud¢ gd esa ukekarj.k Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA rglhy U;k;ky; }kjk vius vkns'k esa ;g vafdr ugha fd;k fd çkFkÊ d¢ gd esa fu"ikfnr olh;rukek D;¨a ekus tkus ;¨X; ugha gS v©j olh;rukek fdl vkèkkj ij QtÊ ,oa dwVjfpr gSA bldk fo'ys"k.k vius vkns'k esa ;g vafdr ugha fd;k fd çkFkÊ d¢ gd esa fu"ikfnr olh;rukek D;¨a ekus tkus ;¨X; ugha gS v©j olh;rukek fdl vkèkkj ij QtÊ ,oa dwVjfpr gSA bldk fo'ys"k.k vius vkns'k esa fd, cxSj t¨ vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] mDr vkns'k fofèk ,oa çfØ;k d¢ foijhr FkkA mudk ;g vuqj¨èk gS fd fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkdj rglhynkj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 20-7-2017] vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 7-11-2017 ,oa vij vk;qDr }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-12-2017 fofèk fo#) g¨us ls fujLr fd, tkus ;¨X; gSA 4- vukosnd vfÒÒk"kd }kjk ;g rdZ çLrqr fd;k x;k gS fd olh;r d¢ vkèkkj ij LoRo vftZr djus d¢ lEcUèk esa O;ogkj U;k;ky; }kjk fu.kZ; fy;k tkuk pkfg,] u fd jktLo U;k;ky; }kjkA mudk ;g Òh rdZ gS fd vèkhuLFk rhu¨a U;k;ky;¨a }kjk fofèk o çfØ;k d¢ vuqdwy vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ftlesa fdlh çdkj d¢ gLr{ksi dh vko';drk ugha gSA mudk eq[; :i ls ;g vuqj¨èk gS fd fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkdj rglhynkj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 20-7-2017] vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 7-11-2017 ,oa vij vk;qDr }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-12-2017 fofèk vuqlkj g¨us ls fLFkj j[ks tkus ;¨X; gSA 5- çdj.k dk voy¨du fd;k x;kA mÒ;i{k vfèkoDrkx.k d¢ rd¨Z ij euu fd;k x;kA 6- çdj.k d¢ voy¨du ls Li"V gS fd vkosndx.k d¢ i{k esa çLrqr olh;r vukosnd i{k }kjk fookfnr gSA tgka olh;r dh oSèkrk fookfnr gS] ogka olh;r d¢ vkèkkj ij jktLo vftZr djus d¢ lEcUèk esa O;ogkj U;k;ky; }kjk fu.kZ; fy;k tkuk pkfg,] u fd jktLo U;k;ky; }kjkA bl lEcUèk esa ekuuh; eè; çns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2021 ¼1½ vkj ,u 221 jathr mQZ ÒÃ;q e¨fgrs fo#) Jherh uafnrk flag ,oa vU; }kjk fuEukuqlkj fuèkkZfjr fd;k x;k gS%& ''(13) Section 110 of MPLRC Code reads as under :- 110. Mutation of acquisition of right in land records. - (1) The Patwari or Nagar Sarvekshak or person authorised under section 109 shall enter into a register prescribed for the purpose every acquisition of right reported to him under section 109 or which comes to his notice from any other source. (2) The Patwari or Nagar Servekshak or person authorised, as the case may be, shall intimate to the Tahsildar, all reports regarding acquisition of right received by him under sub-section (1) in such manner and in such Form as may be prescribed, within thirty days of the receipt thereof by him. (3) On receipt of intimation under section 109 or on receipt of intimation of such acquisition of right from any other source, the Tahsildar shall within fifteen days: (a) register the case in his Court; (b) issue a notice to all persons interested and to such other persons and authorities as may be prescribed, in such Form and manner as may be prescribed; and (c) display a notice relating to the proposed mutation on the notice board of his office, and publish it in the concerned village or sector in such manner as may be prescribed; (4) The Tahsildar shall, after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the persons interested and after making such further enquirty as he may deem necessary, pass orders relating to mutation within thirty days of registration of case, in case of undisputed matter, and withing five months, in case of disputed matter, and make necessary entry in the village khasra or sector khasra, as the case may be, and in other land records. (5) The Tahsildar shall supply a certified copy of the order passed under sub-section (4) and supdated land records free of cost to the parties within thirty days, in the manner prescribed and only thereafter close the case: (6) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 35, no case under this section shall be dismissed due to the absence of a party and shall be disposed of on merits. (7) All proceedings under this section shall be completed within two months in respect of undisputed case and within six months in respect of disputed case from the date of registration of the case. (7) All proceedings under this section shall be completed within two months in respect of undisputed case and within six months in respect of disputed case from the date of registration of the case. In case the proceedings are not disposed of within the specified period, the Tahsildar shall report the information of pending cases to the Collector in such Form and manner as may be prescribed.]'' (14) ''Acquisition of right'' is a crucial aspect which has to be kept in mind while deciding the application under section 110 of MPLR Code. (15) The moot question for consideration is that whether the revenue authoritries ae competent to go to the extent of deciding the disputed question of title by adjudicating the correctness and genuineness of ''Will'' or not? (16) It is submitted by the Counsel for the respondent No. 1 that the right can also be acquired by virtue of a ''Will''. Therefore, once the Tahsildar has a jurisdiction to decide the application under section 110 of MPLRC Code on the basis of acquisition of right of the parties, then the Tahsildar has a jurisdiction to decide the correctness and genuineness of ''Will'' also. (17) Per contra, it is submitted by the Counsel for the State that it is well-established principle of law that the burden to prove the ''Will'' is on the prove the ''Will'' is on the propounder and he has to remove all suspicious circumstances which are attached to a ''Will'' and since the ''Will'' is a departure from the general law of succession, therefore, it necessarily involves the question of title, which cannot be adjudicated by the revenue authorities. (19) Section 31 of MPLR Code reads as under:- ''31. Conferral of Status of Courts on Board and ''Revenue Officers. - The Board or a Revenue Officer, while exercising power under this Code or any other enactment for the time being in force to enquire into or to decide any question arising for determination between the State Government and any person or between parties to any proceedings, shall be a Revenue Court.'' (20) Thus, from the plain reading of the aforesaid section, it is clear that the revenue authorities shall be treated as revenue Court for the purposes of ''any proceedings between the parties''. The important question which involves in the interpretation of section 31 of MPLR Code is as to whether the words ''any proceedings'' would include a question of title also or the proceedings are confined to the proceedings under the MPLR Code only. (21) If an application under section 110 of MPLR Code is filed for mutation of the name of all the legal heirs, then it wold certainly be a proceeding under the MPLR Code because the question of title is not involved and all the legal heirs of a ''Will'' can be said to be a proceeding under the Act or not, is a moot question which requires consideration. (22) Section 178 of MPLR Code reads as under:- ''178. Partition of holding. - (1) If in any holding, which has been assessed for purpose of agriculture under section 59, there are more than on Bhumiswami any such Bhumiswami may apply to a Tahsildar for a partition of his share in the holding: [Provided that if any question of title is raised the Tahsildar shall stay the proceeding before him for a period of thhree months to facilitate the institution of a civil suit for determination of the question of title.] [(1-A) If a civil suit is filed within the period specified in the proviso to sub-section (1), and stay order is obtained from the Civil Court, the Tahsildar shall stay his proceedings pending the decision of the civil Court. If no civil suit is filed within the said period, he shall vacate the stay order and proceed to partition the holding in accordance with the entries in the record of rights.] (2) The Tahsildar, may, after hearing the co-tenure holders, divide the holding and apportion the assessment of the holding in accordance with the rules made under this Code. [(3) x x x] [(4) x x x] [(5) x x x] Explanation I. - For purposes of this section any co-sharer of the holding of a Bhumiswami who has obtained a declaration of his title in such holding from a competent civil Court shall be deemed to be a co-tenure holder of such holding. [(3) x x x] [(4) x x x] [(5) x x x] Explanation I. - For purposes of this section any co-sharer of the holding of a Bhumiswami who has obtained a declaration of his title in such holding from a competent civil Court shall be deemed to be a co-tenure holder of such holding. Explanation II.- [x x x]'' (23) Proviso to sectin 178 (1) of MPLR Code specifically provides that in a partition proceedings, if any question of title is raised by any of the parties, then the revenue authorities shall stay the proceedings for a period of three months in order to facilitate the parties for institution of a civil suit for determination of question of title. Proviso to Section 178 (1) of MPLR Code makes it clear as noon day that uestion of determination of title is beyond jurisdiction of the revenue authoriies, otherwise the Tahsildar was not required to stay the proceedings so that the party to the partion proceedings may institute a civil suit for that the party to the partition proceedings may institute a civil suit for determination of question of title. If the words ''any proceedings'' are read in the light of the proviso to Section 178(1) of MPLR Code, then it is clear that ''any proceedings'' sould not include any proceeding involving the uestion of title of the parties. Whenever the uestion of title is raised or is involved, then the matter has to be adjudicated by the civil Court and not by the revenue authorities.'' (Emphasis added) blh çdkj] eŒçŒ mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fjV ;kfpdk Øekad 1996@2020 egkjkt flag ,oa vU; fo#) jkeçlkn ,oa vU; esa vkns'k fnukad 7-7-2020 esa ;g vfÒfuèkkZfjr fd;k x;k gS%& ''Thus, it is well-established principle of law that the revenue authorities have no jurisdiction to decide the genuineness of the ''Will'' and it is only for the civil Court to decide that whether the ''Will'' was executed or not? Whenever a person claims his right in a property on the basis of a ''Will'', then the Revenue authorities are not competent to decide the genuineness of a ''Will'' and the person claiming the benefit of the ''Will'' must necessarily establish his title by filing a properly constituted civil suit before a competent Court of Civil jurisdiction. Whenever a person claims his right in a property on the basis of a ''Will'', then the Revenue authorities are not competent to decide the genuineness of a ''Will'' and the person claiming the benefit of the ''Will'' must necessarily establish his title by filing a properly constituted civil suit before a competent Court of Civil jurisdiction. In view of the controversy involved in the present case, this Court is of the considered opinion that the petitioners have an efficatcious remedy of establishing their title by filing a civil suit before a Court of competent jurisdiction. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that the Additional Commissioner, Gwalior as well as the SDO (Revenue), Ishagah, District Ashok Nagar did not commit any mistake in setting aside the order passed by the Tahsildar. However, since the petitioners are claiming their title on the basis of ''Will'', therefore, a proverly constituted civil suit for declaration of their right and title on the basis of ''Will''.'' blh çdkj] èkeZohj flag fo#) #Lre flag ¼fofoèk ;kfpdk Øekad 3281@2019½ esa ekuuh; eŒçŒ mPp U;k;ky; d¢ vkns'k fnukad 27-8-2019 esa 2021 ¼1½ vkj ,u 25 fuEufyf[kr U;kf;d m)j.k çfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%& ''Thus, it is held that the Revenue Courts have no jurisdiction to decide the rights of any prarty on the basis of '' Will'' and if somebody wants to claim his/her title over any property, then he/she has to seek declaration from the civil Court of competent jurisdiction... The application filed by the respondents under section 109 and 110 of MP Land Revenue Code is hereby rejected. The respondents are granted liberty that if they so desire, then they can seek declaration from the civil Court of Competent jurisdiction.'' (Emphasis added) ekuuh; eŒçŒ mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB }kjk eqjkjh o vU; fo#) eŒçŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; 2020 ¼4½ ,eŒ ihŒ ,yŒ tsŒ 139 esa fuEukuqlkj fuèkkZfjr fd;k x;k gS%& ''6. The controversy involved in the present matter relates to title based on will, which is purely subject matter of civil Court and can only be decided by the civil Court, with the help of evidence adduced before it, by examining the attesting witnesses. The controversy involved in the present matter relates to title based on will, which is purely subject matter of civil Court and can only be decided by the civil Court, with the help of evidence adduced before it, by examining the attesting witnesses. It is also held in Rejinder Singh and Another v. Financial Commissioner (decided by Punjab & Haryana High Court in Writ Petition No. 3821/2011) that validity of will can be decided by the civil Court, which is the exclusive domin of civil Court and this cannot be decided by the Revenue Courts.'' (Emphasis added) vÒh gky esa gh fnukad 6-9-2021 d¨] ekuuh; lo¨ZPp U;k;ky; }kjk thrsUæ flag fo#) eè; çns'k jkT; ,oa vU; ¼Lis'ky yho fiVh'ku 13146@2021½ esa fuEu U;kf;d fl)kar çfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%& ''As per the settled proposition of law, if there is any dispute with respect to the title and more particularly when the mutation entry is sought to be made on the basis of the will, the party who is claiming title/right on the basis of the will has to approach the appropriate civil Court/Court and get his rights crystalised and only thereafter on the basis of the decision before the civil Court necessary mutation entry can be made..... In view of the above settled proposition of law laid down by this Court, it cannot be said that the High Court has committed any error in setting aside the order passed by the revenue authorities directing to mutate the name of the petitioner herein in the revenue records on the basis of the alleged will dated 20.5.1998 and relegating the petitioner to approach the appropriate court to crystalise his rights on the basis of the alleged will dated 20.5.1998. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the High Court.'' (Emphasis added) Li"V gS fd ekuuh; lo¨ZPp U;k;ky; ,oa ekuuh; eŒçŒ mPp U;k;ky; }kjk] olh;r fookfnr g¨us dh fLFkfr esa] olh;r d¢ vkèkkj ij LoRo dk nkok fl) djus d¢ fy, O;ogkj U;k;ky; ls mn~Ĩ"k.kk djkus d¢ fu"d"kZ fudkys x, gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa] rglhynkj] ygkj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 20-7-2017] vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh] vuqÒkx ygkj] fÒ.M }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 7-11-2017 ,oa vij vk;qDr] eqjSuk }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-12-2017 fofèk vuqlkj g¨us ls fLFkj j[ks tkus ;¨X; gSaA 7- ;g egRoiw.kZ eqn~nk gS fd olh;r ;k fdlh vU; eqn~ns ij flfoy U;k;ky; }kjk vfèkdkj¨a dk fofu'p; g¨us rd D;k jktLo U;k;ky;¨a d¨ ukekarj.k dh dk;Zokgh djuh pkfg, v©j og dk;Zokgh fdl Lo:i dh g¨uh pkfg,A çdj.k lqgkxoarh fo#) dfe'uj] ifV;kyk ¼lhihMCY;w Øekad 14419@2011½ esa ekuuh; iatkc o gfj;k.kk mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB d¢ le{k Bhd ;gh eqn~nk fd;k x;k Fkk%& ''Whether revenue authorities are competent to carry out correction in the khasra girdawari in favour of one of the litigants, who is party in a pending civil suit involving question of title and possession, during the pendency of civil suit?'' mDr eqn~ns dk fujkdj.k ekuuh; iatkc o gfj;k.kk mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.M ihB }kjk fuEukuqlkj fd;k x;k gS%& ''As we have aleready noticed, the object of harvest inspection/girdawari is to collect accurate information regarding crops, change in rights, rent and possession of land, amendments required in the village map, the data with regard to crops for the purpose of overall planning. One must understand that basis or nature of a revenue entry, namely, it neither confers nor divest a party of its title whether proprietary or possessory and is a mere fiscal entry recorded to update the revenue record. It, therefore, cannot be held that a khasra girdawari cannot be recorded or corrected during pendency of a suit. One must understand that basis or nature of a revenue entry, namely, it neither confers nor divest a party of its title whether proprietary or possessory and is a mere fiscal entry recorded to update the revenue record. It, therefore, cannot be held that a khasra girdawari cannot be recorded or corrected during pendency of a suit. Thus, the question posed is hereby answered by holding CWP No. 14419 of 2011 that a revenue authority has jurisdiction to conduct spot inspection with regard to change of entries in the khasra girdawari even if a suit involving a question of title and/or possession is pending, but such an entry is not binding upon a civil Court and any change of possession has to be proved by independent material that may be placed before th Court.'' (Emphasis added) voy¨duh; gS fd ekuuh; eŒçŒ mPp U;k;ky; }kjk tkjh egkjkt flag ,oa vU; fo#) jkeçlkn ,oa vU; v©j èkeZohj flag fo#) #Lre flag d¢ vkns'k] ftud¢ U;k;n`"Vkar Åij iSjk 6 esa mYysf[kr gSa] ekuuh; iatkc o gfj;k.kk mPp U;k;ky; d¢ [k.MihB d¢ blh vkns'k ij vkèkkfjr gSaA ekuuh; [k.MihB }kjk mDrkuqlkj ;g fuèkkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd flfoy U;k;ky; esa dk;Zokgh çpfyr jgus d¢ n©jku jktLo vfÒys[k¨a d¨ fLFkj vFkok rhozen in ugha j[kk tk ldrkA muesa ;Fkk vko';d la'k¨èku o baækt fd, tk ldrs gSa] blesa ukekarj.k Òh 'kkfey gSA mDr lÒh la'k¨èku vFkok baækt fofèkd fl)kar¨a dk ikyu djrs gq, fofèkd çfØ;k ls fu;ekuqlkj fd, tkus g¨axsA mDr baækt] ftlesa ukekarj.k Òh 'kkfey gS] ls lEcfUèkr d¨ LoRo d¢ vfèkdkj ugha feysaxs] u gh blls d¨Ã i{k LoRo ls oafpr g¨xkA LoRo d¢ vfèkdkj¨a dk fofu'p;] fookn dh fLFkfr esa] flfoy U;k;ky; ls gh g¨xk v©j jktLo vfÒys[k¨a esa rnuqlkj baækt fd;k tk,xkA mDrkuqlkj] jktLo U;k;ky;¨a d¢ vkns'k d¢ vkèkkj ij jktLo vfÒys[k¨a esa baækt] flfoy U;k;ky; }kjk vkns'k fn, tkus rd gh jgsxkA 8- Åij iSjk 7 vuqlkj mDr ukekarj.k dh dk;Zokgh Åij iSjk 6 vuqlkj olh;r d¢ vkèkkj ij ugha dh tk,xhA vr% ukekarj.k dh dk;Zokgh LokÒkfod mÙkjkfèkdkfj;¨a d¢ i{k esa dh tk,xh] tSlk fd ekuuh; eè; çns'k mPp U;k;ky; }kjk 2021 ¼1½ vkj ,u 221 jathr mQZ ÒÃ;q e¨fgrs fo#) Jherh uafnrk flag ,oa vU; esa fuEukuqlkj fuèkkZfjr fd;k x;k gS%& ''(33) The Tahsildar is directed to delete the name of respondent No. 1 from the revenue record with immediate effect. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Gwalior is directed to mutate the name of the legal heirs of Late Vijay Singh Rao Mohite as per Hindu Succession Act. If the legal heirs are not available, then the Tahsildar, Tahsil Gwalior is directed to record the name of the Sate Government. (34) the mutation either in the name of legal heir or in the name of State Government shall be subject to the outcome of the civil suit, which is pending between the parties. It is further directed that in case, if the names of the legal heirs of Late Vijay Singh Rao Mohite or the State Government are mutated, then neither the legal heirs nor the State Government would create any third party right in the property and status quo shall be maintatined till the final adjudication by the civil Court.'' blh çdkj d¢ fu"d"kZ iatkc o gfj;k.kk mPp U;k;ky; }kjk jktsUæ flag o vU; fo#) QkÃusal dfe'uj ¼flfoy ;kfpdk Øekad 3821@2011½ d¢ vkns'k fnukad 21 ekpZ 2013 esa fudkys x, gSa%& ''....it is unhesitatingly held that the respondent revenue authorities have rightly sanctioned the mutation on the basis of natural succession, ignoring the will, validity whereof is pending consideration before the learned civil Court.'' (Emphasis added) 9- mij¨Dr iSjk 6 ls 8 dh foospuk d¢ vkèkkj ij fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkdj rhu¨a vèkhuLFk U;k;ky;¨a] rglhynkj] ygkj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 20-7-2017] vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh] vuqÒkx ygkj] fÒ.M }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 7-11-2017 ,oa vij vk;qDr] eqjSuk }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 1-12-2017 fofèk vuqlkj g¨us ls fLFkj j[ks tkrs gSaA 10- olh;r d¢ vkèkkj ij ukekarj.k gsrq vkosnd i{k l{ke U;k;ky; esa okn çLrqr djus gsrq Lora= gSaA ;g Òh vknsf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ukekarj.k fd, tkus d¢ 3 ekg rd ç'ukèkhu Òwfe d¢ gLrkarj.k ij j¨d jgsxh] ftlls vkosnd i{k mDr vofèk esa O;ogkj U;k;ky; esa viuk vfèkdkj LFkkfir djus d¢ fy, eqdnek nk;j dj ld¢ v©j O;ogkj U;k;ky; }kjk Òwfe d¢ gLrkarj.k d¢ lacaèk esa ;Fk¨fpr varfje vkns'k fn, tk ld¢A