vkns'k 1- vihykFkÊ d¢ fo}ku vfÒÒk"kd }kjk dk;eh ij çLrqr rd¨Z ij fopkj fd;k x;kA 2- çdj.k d¢ laf{kIr rF; bl çdkj gSa fd vihykFkÊ ftrsUæ dqekj }kjk uk;c rglhynkj Lyheukckn rglhy cg¨jhcan ftyk dVuh d¢ le{k can¨cLr dh =qfV lqèkkj fd, tkus ckor vkosnu bl vkèkkj ij çLrqr fd;k x;k fd xzke nsojh Òkj dk [kkrk Øekad 218@4] 218@2 ftldk u;k uEcj 268 gS ij =qfVo'k can¨cLr d¢ le; eŒçŒ 'kklu fy[k x;k gS] mlesa lqèkkj fd;k tk,A uk;c rglhynkj us gYdk iVokjh ls tkap çfrosnu çkIr dj Lo;a d¢ çfrosnu lfgr çdj.k vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh d¨ çsf"kr fd;kA vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh us çdj.k lquokà mijkar vkns'k fnukad 11-12-2017 ls vihykFkÊ dk =qfV lqèkkj dk vkosnu fujLr fd;kA vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh }kjk ikfjr vkns'k d¢ fo#) vihykFkÊ }kjk lafgrk dh èkkjk 44¼1½ d¢ rgr vij vk;qDr] tcyiqj laÒkx d¢ le{k çFke vihy çLrqr dh xÃA vij vk;qDr us lquokà mijkar fnukad 13-11-2018 d¨ vkns'k ikfjr djrs gq, vihy [kkfjt dhA vij vk;qDr d¢ blh vkns'k d¢ fo#) ;g f}rh; vihy lafgrk dh èkkjk 44¼2½ d¢ vUrxZr bl U;k;ky; esa çLrqr dh xà gSA 3- vihykFkÊ d¢ fo}ku vfÒÒk"kd us eq[; :i ls rdZ çLrqr fd;k fd vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh d¢ vkns'k d¢ fo#) =qfVo'k vij vk;qDr d¢ le{k vihy çLrqr dh xà FkhA çFke vihy esa vij vk;qDr }kjk vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k Fkk] blfy, bl U;k;ky; esa f}rh; vihy çLrqr dh xà gSA vihykFkÊ vfÒÒk"kd }kjk l{ke U;k;ky; esa vihy çLrqr djus d¢ funsZ'k çnku fd, tkus dk vuqj¨èk fd;k x;kA 4- vihykFkÊ d¢ fo}ku vfÒÒk"kd }kjk çLrqr rd¨Z d¢ ifjçs{; esa çdj.k ,oa mlesa miyCèk nLrkost¨a dk voy¨du fd;k x;kA 5- çdj.k d¢ voy¨du ls Li"V gS fd orZeku çdj.k esa vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh }kjk can¨cLr d¢ le; gqà =qfV d¢ lqèkkj d¢ vkosnu ij lafgrk dh èkkjk 89 d¢ vUrxZr ewy vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] mld¢ fo#) çFke vihy dysDVj d¨ çLrqr dh tkuh Fkh] u fd vij vk;qDr U;k;ky; esaA vihykFkÊ dk ;g rdZ gS fd mud¢ }kjk =qfVo'k U;k;ky; vij vk;qDr esa vihy çLrqr dj nh xÃA ;g fofèk dk lqLFkkfir fl)kar gS fd ;fn fdlh U;k;ky; }kjk vfèkdkfjrk&foghu vkns'k tkjh fd;k x;k gS] rc og voSèk o 'kwU; ekuk tk,xkA ijarq bl çdj.k esa fopkj.kh; fcanq ;g gS fd vihykFkÊ }kjk Lo;a U;k;ky; dysDVj d¢ LFkku ij] U;k;ky; vij vk;qDr esa çFke vihy çLrqr dh xà gS] rc D;k bl fLFkfr esa Òh U;k;ky; vij vk;qDr dk vfèkdkfjrk&foghu vkns'k voSèk o 'kwU; ekuk tk,xk\ bl lacaèk esa ekuuh; lo¨ZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEufyf[kr U;k;n`"Vkar }kjk fofèk dh fLFkfr Li"V dh xà gSA bl lacaèk esa 1990 ¼1½ ,l lh lh 193 lq'khy dqekj esBk fo#) x¨foUn jke c¨gjk esa ekuuh; lo¨ZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEufyf[kr U;k;n`"Vkar çfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%& In Ledgard v. Bull, [1886] Law Report, 13 AC, 134 the privy Council laid down that where the original Court in a suit was inherently lacking jurisdiction, and was incompetent to try the same, on its transfer by consent of parties, to a Court with jurisdiction such consent did not operate as waiver of the plea of want of jurisdiction. In Bartan v. Fincham, [1921] 2 Kings Bench Division, 291 at 299 it was held that: ''Parties cannot by agreement give the Courts jurisdiction which the Legislature has enacted they are not to have. The Court cannot give effect to an agreement whether by way of compromise or otherwise, inconsistent with the provisions of the Act.'' .... A decree passed by a Court without jurisdiction over the subject matter or on other grounds which goes to the root of its exercise or jurisdiction, lacks inherent jurisdiction. It is a corum non judice. A decree passed by such a Court is a nullity and is non est. validity can be set up whenever it is sought to be enforced or is acted upon as a foundation for a right, even at the stage of execution or in collateral proceedings. The defect of jurisdiction strikes at the authority of the Cout to pass a decree which cannot be cured by consent or waiver of the party. (Emphasis added) blh çdkj 1978 , vkà vkj 1062 cyà pUæ gktjk fo#) 'ksoèkkjh tkno esa ekuuh; lo¨ZPp U;k;ky; }kjk fuEufyf[kr U;k;n`"Vkar çfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS%& If the Court lacks in herent jurisdiction no amount of consent can confer jurisdiction..... Consent in such a situation could not be interpreted as waiver of the objection nor could it confer jurisdiction where the Court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the suit. Following the decision in Ledgard v. Bull (supra), it was held that when the Judge has no inherent jurisdiction over the subject matter of a suit, the parties cannot by their mutual consent covert it into a proper judicial process, although they may constitute the Judge their arbiter, and be bound by his decision on the merits when these are submitted to him. (Emphasis added) mDrkuqlkj ekuuh; lo¨ZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ;g fuèkkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd i{kdkj dh lgefr g¨us dh fLFkfr esa Òh] vfèkdkfjrk&foghu vkns'k voSèk o 'kwU; gh jgsxkA ;fn foèkkf;dk }kjk fdlh U;k;ky; esa d¨Ã vfèkdkfjrk oSf"Br ugha dh xà gS] rc i{kdkj dh lgefr U;k;ky; esa mDr vfèkdkfjrk fufgr ugha dj nsxhA mDr vkèkkj ij U;k;ky; vij vk;qDr dk vkns'k voSèk o 'kwU; gSA 6- mij¨Dr foospuk d¢ vkèkkj ij vk;qDr dk vkns'k fnukad 13-11-2018 fujLr fd;k tkdj çdj.k bl funsZ'k d¢ lkFk fujkÑr fd;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkÊ vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh d¢ ewy vkns'k d¢ fo#) dysDVj U;k;ky; esa vihy çLrqr djus d¢ fy, Lora= gSaA bl U;k;ky; esa O;rhr le; d¨ le;&lhek esa ekU; fd, tkus d¢ vkns'k Òh çnku fd, tkrs gSaA lkFk gh] dysDVj dVuh d¨ ;g funsZ'k fn, tkrs gSa fd vihykFkÊ dh v¨j ls mud¢ le{k vuqfoÒkxh; vfèkdkjh d¢ vkns'k dh vihy çLrqr fd, tkus ij vij vk;qDr dk vkns'k fnukad 18-11-2018 voSèk o 'kwU; g¨us dh fLFkfr esa] xq.k&n¨"k d¢ lacaèk esa mud¢ }kjk fd;k x;k fofu'p; laKku esa u fy;k tkdj vihy çdj.k esa u, fljs ls mÒ; i{k d¨ lquokà dk volj nsdj xq.k&n¨"k ij vkns'k ikfjr djsaA