Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2021 DIGILAW 837 (ALL)

Yogendra Singh @ Ramu v. State of U. P.

2021-08-09

OM PRAKASH-VII

body2021
JUDGMENT : 1. Heard Sri Raj Bahadur Verma, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State as well as Sri Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. This application for bail has been filed on behalf of the accused-applicant Yogendra Singh @ Ramu involved in case crime no.192 of 2020, under sections 363, 366, 376, 506 IPC and section 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Mirzapur, District Shahjahanpur. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has not committed present offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that offences levelled in the matter are not attracted against the applicant. First information report was lodged by the brother of the victim. Victim was aged about 17 years. As per her statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C., she went from the house at her own free will. It is further submitted that statement of the victim under section 164 Cr.P.C. is recorded on the basis of advise and pressure. Had the applicant committed the present offence, this fact would have come in the statement recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C. itself. It is further argued that no prima facie case is made out against the applicant, who is languishing in jail since 23.10.2020 having no criminal antecedents. In case applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail and argued that victim is minor. She has clearly supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. Offence of rape was committed upon her against her wishes. A prima facie case is made out against the applicant. 5. Keeping in view the nature and gravity of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, and submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that it is not a fit case for bail. 6. The bail application is rejected. 7. The party shall file self-attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. 6. The bail application is rejected. 7. The party shall file self-attested computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.