Karam Veer, S/o Sh. Prem v. Narcotics Control Bureau Zonel, Sector 25, Chandigarh Union Of India, Through Intelligence Office, Ncb Chandigarh
2021-12-14
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
body2021
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER : Petitioner has approached this Court, invoking provisions of Section 439 of Cr.P.C., for enlarging him on bail in case FIR No. 66 of 2019, dated 7.11.2019, registered under Sections 8, 20, 25, 28, 29 and 60 of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 in Police Station Baddi (Nalagarh), District Solan, H.P. 2. As per prosecution case petitioner has been found involved in transportation of 8.75 Kilograms Charas and 1.020 Kilograms of Opium and trial is in progress. 3. Petitioner had also approached this Court by filing Cr.M.P. (M) No. 1206 of 2020, which was dismissed on 7.12.2020 on merits. 4. Present petition has been preferred by petitioner, seeking bail, mainly on medical grounds, referring his ailment by substantiating his claim by placing on record prescription slips and other documents, indicating his ongoing treatment. 5. To verify the claim of the petitioner, vide order dated 27.11.2021, petitioner was ordered to undergo medical examination to be conducted by Medical Board constituted by Medical Superintendent, Medical College, Nahan with direction to the Board to submit its report by answering the question as to whether treatment of the petitioner is not possible in jail. 6. In response to the aforesaid, petitioner has been subjected to medical examination and as per medical examination report received through Superintendent of Jail Nahan, following findings have been reported:- “At present on examination patient conscious & ambulatory. Pulse rate:- 76 per minute, BP: 140/90 and SPo2:-98% Chest is clear Cardiovascular examination is within normal limits ECG done. WNL In my opinion at present patient is haemodynamically stable. He requires continued treatment as prescribed and on going from PGI Chandigarh. In case of recurrent of chest pain patient would require further evaluation under cardiologist.” 7. In view of aforesaid report, I do not find any merit in the prayer made by the petitioner at this stage. Therefore, present petition is dismissed.