JUDGMENT : 1. The petitioner, who is owner of 18.90 Ares of land in Manalithara Village of Thalappilly Taluk in Thrissur District, has filed this writ petition seeking to direct the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 application within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner states that he is owner of 18.90 Ares of land situated in Survey No.137/6 of Manalithara Village, Thalappilly Taluk in Thrissur District. The land is a garden land. It is not cultivated with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either. However, the land is included in the Data Bank and is described as converted land in Revenue records also. 3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P5 application in Form-5, invoking Rule 4(d) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application was filed on 24.01.2022. The application is not disposed of so far. Unless the application is considered expeditiously, the petitioner will be put to untold hardship and loss, contends the petitioner. 4. The Government Pleader representing the respondents resisted the writ petition. The Government Pleader controverted all material allegations made by the petitioner, in the writ petition. The Government Pleader, however, submitted that since the petitioner has invoked a statutory remedy under the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, the application submitted by the petitioner can be considered by the competent authority in accordance with law, provided the application is received, is complete in all respects and is supported by all necessary documents. 5. The Government Pleader points out that the authorities have taken Section 13 proceedings against the petitioner which has become final. The revision petition preferred by the petitioner is also rejected. I find that even if Section 13 proceedings are concluded, the petitioner has a right to get considered his application for removal of his land from Data Bank. 6. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents. 7. The petitioner is owner of 18.90 Ares of land situated in Survey No.137/6 of Manalithara Village, Thalappilly Taluk in Thrissur District. The land is included in the Data Bank of paddy land and wetland prepared under Section 5(4)(i) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. 7. The petitioner is owner of 18.90 Ares of land situated in Survey No.137/6 of Manalithara Village, Thalappilly Taluk in Thrissur District. The land is included in the Data Bank of paddy land and wetland prepared under Section 5(4)(i) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008. According to the petitioner, the land owned by him is neither paddy land nor wetland. The land is not suitable for paddy cultivation. The petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes and hence he has filed an application in Form-5 seeking to remove the land from Data Bank. 8. The Form-5 application has been filed by the petitioner invoking his statutory right under Rule 4(d) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application being a statutory application, the competent authority has a legal duty to consider the application in accordance with law, within a reasonable time. The writ petition is therefore disposed of directing the 3rd respondent to consider Ext.P5 Form-5 application submitted by the petitioner if the same is received, supported by all requisite documents and paying prescribed fee, if any, and to pass orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of three months. While considering the application, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall advert to Ext.P7 KSREC report also.