ORDER Leave granted. 2. This appeal by way of special leave arises out of the order passed High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi allowing an application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Code’) pending disposal of an appeal arising out of the judgment in a petition for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. 3. Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, learned Advocate-on-Record, who is on caveat, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 4. Admittedly, the appeal arising out of the judgment of the Family Court under Section 13(1)(i) and (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is pending before the High Court. 5. The Division Bench has committed two mistakes. They are : (1) It has independently considered the application under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code, while the normal rule is to take it up along with the main appeal; and (2) The Division Bench has indicated the extent to which the additional evidence has to be considered. 6. In other words, the relevancy, admissibility, etc. of the documents had not been gone into by the Court. 7. Therefore, the appeal is allowed. The impugned order is set aside and the application being IA No. 9370 of 2019 is directed to be taken up afresh along with the main appeal being F.A. No. 207 of 2017. 8. The arguments advanced by both the parties regarding the admissibility, relevancy and proof of the additional documents are left open to be advanced at the stage of the final hearing of the appeal along with the application.