Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1100 (RAJ)

Praveen v. State

2022-04-06

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

body2022
JUDGMENT Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 43/2022, Police Station Kotwali Nagaur, District Nagaur, for the offences under Sections 8/15 & 8/21 of the NDPS act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that after rejection of the first bail application on 22.02.2022, the charge sheet has been filed. The recovered contraband is below the commercial quantity. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is also entitled for the grant of bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Praveen S/o Baldevram shall be released on bail in connection with F.I.R. No. 43/2022, Police Station Kotwali Nagaur, District Nagaur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees: One Lac Only) with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. 7. However, it is made clear that after the enlargement on bail in this case, if the petitioner is found involved in any other criminal case, then no leniency will be extended to the petitioner in future. Record of this condition and the antecedents of the petitioner will be maintained by the concerned Police Station of the area where the petitioner resides. 8. a copy of this order be sent to the local police station where the petitioner resides. 9. It is also ordered that the petitioner will mark his attendance in the local police station of the area of his permanent residence in every three months.