JUDGMENT (Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider the representation given by the petitioners on 09.05.2022 and stop the General Meeting will be held on 21.05.2022 of the first respondent herein namely South Indian Cine, Television Artists and Dubbing Artists Union and file a final report within stipulated time.) 1. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the second respondent to consider the representation given by the petitioners on 09.05.2022 and stop the General Body Meeting scheduled to be held on 21.05.2022. 2. The petitioner states that he is a member of the first respondent union i.e. South Indian Cine, Television Artists and Dubbing Artists Union. The first respondent union is governed by its by-laws and the petitioner states that he is regularly participating in the union meetings and other related activities. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the election of the office bearers conducted by the first respondent union was challenged before the civil court and the present writ petition is filed for the purpose of directing the second respondent/Additional Registrar of Trade Unions to consider the representation. 4. The representation dated 07.05.2022submitted by the petitioners reveal that they made a request to the second respondent/Additional Registrar of Trade Unions to stop the General Body Meeting scheduled to be held on 21.05.2022. 5. The first respondent union is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. The second respondent/Additional Registrar of Trade Unions, no doubt, in the event of any irregularity in union affairs, is empowered to initiate action in the manner known to law, as far as the eneral Body Meetings are concerned, it is decided by the Union and already the petitioners have filed a civil suit in O.S.No. 2466 of 2022 on the file of the V City Civil Court, Chennai, which is pending. 6. This being the factum, the petitioners have to redress their grievances before the competent court of law and more specifically in a suit, which is already instituted and pending. However, High Court cannot entertain a writ petition of this nature, more specifically questioning the General Body of Meeting scheduled to be held on 21.05.2022. 6. This being the factum, the petitioners have to redress their grievances before the competent court of law and more specifically in a suit, which is already instituted and pending. However, High Court cannot entertain a writ petition of this nature, more specifically questioning the General Body of Meeting scheduled to be held on 21.05.2022. A writ petition filed even seeking a direction to dispose of the representation need not be entertained in a routine manner by merely directing the authorities. A mere direction would do no service to the cause of justice, contrarily it would result in multiplicity of proceedings. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the competent civil court of law for the purpose of adjudication of issues and resolve their grievances in the manner known to law. With this liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous are closed.