JUDGMENT Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 22.08.2019 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Rajsamand whereby, the application preferred by the respondent No. 4 under Order 6 Rule 2(iii) CPC was allowed and it was directed that the dates, amounts and figures mentioned in the plaint of the petitioner be written and expressed in the words by amending the plaint. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the learned trial court passed the impugned order dated 22.08.2019 without recording any reasons. He further submits that even in the application preferred by the respondent No. 4, it is not clear that which dates, amounts and numbers are not clear in the plaint and what is the confusion in the mind of the defendant about the same. 3. I have considered the submissions made at the Bar and gone through the impugned order dated 22.08.2019. 4. a perusal of the impugned order shows that the learned trial court only directed that certain dates, amounts and figures mentioned in the plaint be written in the figures as well as in the words by amending the plaint. The impugned order dated 22.08.2019 in no way will prejudice the case of the petitioner. 5. It is noted that the petitioner is the plaintiff in the present case and by virtue of the order dated 22.08.2019 since no prejudice caused to the petitioner, if, the amendment as ordered is carried out. The proceedings of the suit has been delayed by the petitioner-plaintiff himself without any reasonable cause. 6. In view of the discussions made above, the order dated 22.08.2019 does not require any interference by this Court. The writ petition, therefore, is dismissed.