Research › Search › Judgment

Karnataka High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1241 (KAR)

Kaveri v. State of Karnataka

2022-09-20

SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

body2022
JUDGMENT 1. This petition is filed by accused No.2 under Sec. 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Cr.P.C .', for brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.193/2021 of Garag Police Station, registered for the offences punishable under Ss. 302, 120(B), 109 read with Sec. 34 of The Indian Penal Code (hereina fter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevity). 2. The case of the prosecution as per the charge sheet is that, complainant Siddappa is residing with his elder son Yallappa and his family members in the farm house at Mulamuttal Village and his younger son Bhimappa (deceased) was residing separately in the house at Bhajantri Oni in Mulamuttal Village with his wife Kaveri (accused No.2) and their children. The house of Shivanand (accused No.1) is ad jacent to the house of deceased Bhimappa. Since one year accused No.1 developed illicit relationship with accused No.2 who is the wife of the deceased Bhimappa which had come to the notice of complainant, Bhimappa and other family members. The said Bhimappa became angry over the said illicit relationship of his wife with accused No .1 and as a result, there were frequent quarrels between the deceased Bhimappa and accused No.2. It is further case of the prosecution that accused Nos.1 and 2 thought of finishing the deceased Bhimappa as he was quarrelling with the petitioner/accused No.2 and he was abusing her everyday and has become obstacle in their relationship. The accused Nos.1 and 2 planed to eliminate Bhimappa. That on 14/12/2021 at 01:35 a.m., accused No .1 came with an axe from his house to the room where Bhimappa was sleeping on a cot. With the assistance of the accused No.2/petitioner accused No.1 assaulted Bhimappa with axe on his right ear, head, neck and caused in juries and the said Bhimappa died. The accused No.2 informed the murder of Bhimappa to his family members. The complainant came along with his elder son Yallappa and saw the dead body on the cot in the house, collected information from his uncle one Hanumant Basavanneppa Karishiddanavar and filed complaint. After completing investigation, charge sheet came to be filed and case is now pending in S.C .No .28/2022 . This petitioner/accused No.2 came to be arrested on 14/12/2021 and she is in judicial custody. After completing investigation, charge sheet came to be filed and case is now pending in S.C .No .28/2022 . This petitioner/accused No.2 came to be arrested on 14/12/2021 and she is in judicial custody. The petitioner/accused No.2 filed the bail application in S.C.No.28/2022 and the same came to be rejected by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dharwad by order dtd. 12/8/2022 . Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking bail. 3. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that there are no eyewitnesses to the incident and the case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidences. As per the statement of CW12 - Hanmantappa, he saw the accused No .1 coming out of the house of the deceased holding axe and therefore, he is not an eyewitness to the incident. In the spot mahazar, there is a mention that there is a separate bed in the room in which the deceased found on the cot shows that the petitioner/accused No.2 was sleeping separately. The petitioner/accused No.2 informed the murder of her husband deceased Bhimappa to the complainant. The petitioner is having two minor daughters. As the charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not required for any custodial interrogation. With this, he prayed to allow the petition. 5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader would contend that the voluntary statement of accused No.2 has been recorded wherein she specifically stated that they conspired to kill her husband deceased Bhimappa as he is coming in the way of her illicit relationship with accused No.1 and with her assistance the accused No.1 gained entry in the house holding axe and entered the room where the deceased was sleeping and she removed the blanket from the face of the deceased and held his legs as directed by accused No.1 and accused No.1 assaulted with the axe three four times on his right ear, head, neck and caused death of the deceased. It is his further submission that the said aspect collaborates the statement of CW12 who is the eyewitness to the incident whose statement is also recorded under Sec. 164 o f Cr.P .C. The post mortem report reveals that there are two injuries and death is due to hemorrhage and shock as a result of chop injuries sustained. Mobile phones o f accused No.1 and 2 were seized and Investigating Officer is yet to collect call detail records. The charge sheet material shows prima facie case against the petitioner for the offences alleged against her. If the petitioner is granted bail, she will threaten the complainant and other prosecution witnesses. With this, he prayed to reject the petition. 6. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader, this Court has gone through the charge sheet reports. 7. As per accusation in the charge sheet, this petitioner/accused No.2 had an illicit relationship with accused No.1 and deceased was objecting for the same and quarrelling with the petitioner/accused No.2. Therefore, the petitioner/accused No.2 and accused No.1 conspired to finish the deceased. On 14/12/2021 at 01:35 a.m., the accused No .2 holding axe gained the entry in the room of the deceased with the assistance of the petitioner/accused No .2 and with her help he assaulted the deceased with axe on his right ear, head, neck and caused his death. As per the averments of the complainant who is the father-in-law of the petitioner and father of the deceased, there was an illicit relationship between accused Nos.1 and 2 and Bhimappa was ob jecting and quarrelling with the petitioner. Even inspite of advice, the accused Nos.1 and 2 continued their illicit relationship. Entry of the accused No.1 in the room of the deceased itself shows that this petitioner/accused No.2 facilitated and assisted accused No.1 to enter the room of the deceased. CW12 has seen accused No.1 coming out of the room of the deceased holding blood stained axe and going towards his house and went inside and saw the deceased with in juries and at that time, this petitioner/accused No.2 was standing there who told him that she and accused No.1 finished the deceased as he was repeatedly quarrelling with her. CW12 has seen accused No.1 coming out of the room of the deceased holding blood stained axe and going towards his house and went inside and saw the deceased with in juries and at that time, this petitioner/accused No.2 was standing there who told him that she and accused No.1 finished the deceased as he was repeatedly quarrelling with her. As per voluntary statement of this petitioner/accused No.2 she held the legs o f the deceased at the time of accused No.1 assaulting the deceased with axe . On perusal of the entire charge sheet material, there is prima facie case against this petitioner/accused No.2 for the offence alleged against her. The offence alleged against her is punishable with death or imprisonment for life . I f the petitioner is granted bail, there is a threat to the complainant and other prosecution witnesses. The petitioner has not made out any grounds for grant of bail. Hence, the petition is dismissed.