Research › Search › Judgment

Andhra High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1316 (AP)

Ganta Srinivasa Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

2022-11-17

V.SUJATHA

body2022
JUDGMENT V.Sujatha, J. - This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- '....to issue Writ Order or Direction declaring the action of the 4th Respondent not entertaining the Gift deed dated12.05.2015 presented by the Petitioner for registration on the alleged ground that the subject vacant site admeasuring an extent of 145.2 Square Yards in R.S.No. 647/5 of Atkuru Village, Unguturu Mandal, Krishna District is a Gramakantam which is prohibited for registration as illegal arbitrary contrary to the provisions under the scheme of the Registration Act 1908 without jurisdiction and contrary to the judgments rendered by this Hon'ble Court from time to time and consequently direct the 4th Respondent to entertain the gift in document dated 12.05.2015 for registration and release the document after registration....' 2. When this Writ Petition came up for admission, this court passed an Interim Order on 03.06.2015 as follows: 3. 'Petitioner states that his gift deed presented for registration is not being received by the 4th respondent on the ground that the land is classified as Gram Kantam. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the said issue regarding Gramkantam is already adjudicated by this court directing the registering authority to receive and register the document vide W.P.No.13164 of 2015 dated 01.05.2015. 5. Since the learned Government Pleader states that the 4th respondent is bound to receive the document, if presented for registration and deal with it in accordance with law, there shall be interim direction to the 4th respondent to receive the document presented by the petitioner and deal with it in accordance with law. 6. Learned Government Pleader to get instructions List after four(04) weeks'. 7. At the time of hearing the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that it would suffice if the Interim Order is made as the Final Order. 8. Having regard to the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of Interim Orders passed by this Court. There shall be no order as to costs. 9. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.