Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1327 (MAD)

Rajasekaran v. P. Rajendran

2022-06-10

S.ANANTHI

body2022
JUDGMENT (Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, to initiate appropriate proceedings against the respondent/revision petitioner herein for committing fraud on Court by filing fabricated medical records.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to initiate appropriate proceedings against the respondent/petitioner for committing fraud on court by filing fabricated medical record. 2. Heard on the side of the petitioner. 3. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitioner that to initiate action against the respondent herein as contemplated under Section 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, read with Section195 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in the light of the fact that the revision petitioner has filed a fabricated false evidence before this Court by way of an additional typed set of papers under U.S.R.No.20934 of 2021, dated 20.09.2021, filed on 20.09.2021. It is further stated that the fabricated false evidence is a medical record issued by Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, to the effect that the revision petitioner got admitted in the said Hospital on 09.08.2019 and got discharged on 20.08.2019, under Admission No. 201806270026. He has tampered the actual date of admission which was 27.06.2018, as 09.08.2019. Similarly, he has tampered actual date of discharge, which was 07.07.2018 as 20.08.2019. The said detail was confirmed by the petitioner from the Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, wherein a letter dated 11.12.2021 addressed to the petitioner by the said Hosptial clearly demonstrate the criminal fraudulent Act of the revision petitioner in fabricating the medical records. 4. The respondent herein/revision petitioner has filed C.R.P.(MD) No.1239 of 2021 to set aside order in I.A.No.10 of 2020 in RCOP No.13 of 2018 and the said petition was filed to condone delay of 184 days in set aside exparte order the same was dismissed by Rent Control Court. 5. The said Civil Revision Petition was also dismissed on 21.09.2021 on the ground that no document was filed to prove the reason for non-appearance. But on 20.09.2021 the revision petitioner has filed one medical record, which was not put up by the Registry in bundle, returned on 24.09.2021 as already Civil Revision Petition was disposed. 6. The document is a medical record which was issued from Velammal Hospital. But this petitioner got RTI from Velammal Hospital that they have not issued the said certificate. But on 20.09.2021 the revision petitioner has filed one medical record, which was not put up by the Registry in bundle, returned on 24.09.2021 as already Civil Revision Petition was disposed. 6. The document is a medical record which was issued from Velammal Hospital. But this petitioner got RTI from Velammal Hospital that they have not issued the said certificate. So, the present petition has been filed to punish the revision petitioner. 7. The plea taken by the respondent is that the document not at all placed before the Judge for consideration. So, the offence is not made out. 8. Even if it is not considered the production of fabricated document before the Court itself is an offence. 9. As per Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, prima facie the offence comes under Section 463 of IPC. The revision petitioner has produced the document in support of his claim. So, this Court is inclined to refer the matter to the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate. 10. Finally, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. The matter is referred to the concerned learned Jurisdictional Magistrate to take further action. The learned Judicial Magistrate is further directed to issue notice on either side and decide the matter on merits without influencing the findings of this Court.