Research › Search › Judgment

Meghalaya High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 145 (MEG)

Anil Kumar v. Union of India

2022-06-02

WANLURA DIENGDOH

body2022
JUDGMENT Wanlura Diengdoh, J. - Heard Mr. K.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner who has submitted that a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred before this Court by the petitioner against the conviction order passed by the General Assam Rifles Court, wherein in a Court-martial proceedings, the petitioner was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and was also to be dismissed from service. 2. That the said writ petition is pending for adjudication before this Court. In the meantime, the petitioner has sought for suspension of his sentence and to be allowed to be released on bail pending disposal of the said writ petition. 3. It is also submitted that the petitioner has already undergone 183 days of imprisonment out of the total punishment of one year and as such, by well established principles of bail jurisprudence and also well settled pronouncement of various courts of this country, the sentence of the petitioner may be suspended at this juncture and he may be released on bail with any condition to be imposed by this Court. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner on a query by this Court has submitted that the High Court exercising powers under Article 226 in cases of this kind has the power to suspend the sentence and to grant bail to the applicant. The case of Col. Harish Chandra Goswamy v. Union of India & Ors.: wherein the Hon'ble Delhi High Court on an application seeking interim relief during the pendency of the criminal writ petition preferred by the petitioner herein who has been found guilty in the proceedings held by the General Court-martial and has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment of two years, has, on consideration of the submission made held that the High Court has got the power to grant interim relief during the pendency of the main writ petition on merits and has accordingly, suspended the sentence and granted bail to the petitioner herein. 5. 5. Another limb of the argument of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has a family of three minor children along with his wife who is ailing and has to be looked after and as such, if not released on bail, he will not be able to take care of the family, besides the fact that the family members of the petitioner have been asked to vacate the family quarter by 01.07.2022. 6. Dr. N. Mozika, learned ASG appearing for the respondents has not made any strong objection to the prayer of the petitioner, but has only submitted that the petitioner may be directed to vacate the family quarter before the date fixed i.e. 01.07.2022. 7. On consideration of the submission made, this Court is persuaded by the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court cited above and also holds that power can be exercised under Article 226 to grant interim relief to the petitioner by directing for suspension of the sentence and to allow the petitioner to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. The sentence imposed upon the petitioner by the General Assam Rifles Court dated 12.02.2022 is hereby suspended pending final disposal of the main petition. The petitioner is also directed to be released on bail on conditions that: i) He shall not abscond or leave the jurisdiction of India during the pendency of the writ petition; and ii) He shall furnish a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only along with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Registrar General of this Court. 9. As conceded by the petitioner, he is allowed to vacate the family quarter on or before the 01.07.2022. 10. With the above, this petition is hereby disposed of. No costs.