Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1450 (RAJ)

Hansa Bai v. State Of Rajasthan

2022-05-06

CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

body2022
ORDER 1. This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 38/2022 registered at Police Station Dablana, District Bundi for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 326 and 308 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a woman of 37 years of age and having a child of two and half years of age. Learned counsel further submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel further submits that the accused-party has also lodged a cross FIR No.37/2022 and interim protection from arrest has been granted to the petitioner by this Court vide order dated 20.04.2022. Hence, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be granted. 3. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case; but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and it is ordered that in case of arrest of the accused-petitioner in FIR No. 38/2022 registered at Police Station Dablana, District Bundi by the Investigation Officer, the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail; provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following conditions: i) That the petitioner will make herself available for the investigation as and when required by the investigation officer. ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without permission of the Court. iii) That the petitioner will not temper with the evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses in the case.