Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1483 (RAJ)

Pratapi Bai v. State

2022-05-09

MANOJ KUMAR GARG

body2022
JUDGMENT Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The petitioners has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 180/2021 of Police Station Kurabad, District Udaipur, for the offence punishable under Sections 306, 323, 341 & 34 of IPC. 2. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no evidence against the petitioners for abatement to commit suicide and the challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail applications. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. accordingly, these bail applications filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Pratapi Bai W/o Gaurishankar Ji, (2) Kalu @ Kallu S/o Ganesh Lal, (3) Raju S/o Ganesh Lal and (4) Shanti Lal S/o Gorishankar, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.180/2021 of Police Station Kurabad, District Udaipur, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.