JUDGMENT 1- /kkjk 24 lifBr /kkjk 151 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr ;g varj.k ;kfpdk izkfFkZuh&iRuh us ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa yafcr nkEiR; laca/kksa dh iquLFkkZiuk dk nhokuh nkok la[;k&38@2019 'kkfdj gqlSu cuke jsgkuk ckuks dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj esa varfjr djus ds fy;s izLrqr dh gSA eSaus i{kdkjku ds ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k dh cgl lquh o vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkfFkZuh us ;g rdZ fn;k gS fd vizkFkhZ𝔦 us ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa nkEiR; laca/kksa dh iquLFkkZiuk dk nkok izkfFkZuh&iRuh ds fo:) izLrqr fd;k gS] tks yafcr gSA izkfFkZuh dk fudkg lhdj esa lEiUu gqvkA i{kdkjku ds nl ekg dh yM+dh gSA izkfFkZuh us Hkj.kiks"k.k gsrq vkosnu fnukad 22-04-2019 dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj esa izLrqr fd;k gSA lhdj ls chdkussj dh nwjh 220 fdyksehVj gSA izkfFkZuh ds ekrk&firk o`) gSaA izkfFkZuh ds fy;s nl ekg dh iq=h ds lkFk lhdj ls chdkusj dh ;k=k djuk vlqfo/kkiw.kZ gSA ,sls izdj.kksa esa iRuh dh lqfo/kk egRoiw.kZ gksrh gS] blfy;s ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa yafcr mi;qZDr izdj.k dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj esa varfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA mUgksaus vius rdksZ dh iqf"V esa fuEufyf[kr uthjsa is'k dh] ftudk eSaus voyksdu fd;kA 1- S.B. Civil Transfer Application No. 13/2012 Anshu Bhatnagar v. Rajendra Bhatnagar Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur 2- S.B. Civil Transfer Application No. 187/2021 Smt. Mumal Singh v. Ravindra Singh Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur 2- ;ksX; vf/koDrk vizkFkhZ𝔦 us mi;qZDr rdksZ dk fojks/k fd;kA mUgksaus rdZ fn;k fd vizkFkhZ }kjk nkEiR; laca/kksa dh iquLFkkZiuk dk nkok izLrqr fd;s tkus ds i'pkr izkfFkZuh us Hkj.kiks"k.k dh dk;Zokgh lhdj esa izkjEHk dh gSA ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa yafcr izdj.k dks izkfFkZuh us lhdj fLFkr ikfjokfjd U;k;ky; esa varfjr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k gSA chdkusj dk {ks=kf/kdkj jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh eq[; ihB] tks/kiqj dks izkIr gS] blfy;s gLrxr varj.k ;kfpdk t;iqj ihB ds le{k viks"k.kh; gSA vr% varj.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA eSaus mi;ZqDr izLrqr fojks/kh rdksZ ij fopkj fd;kA izkfFkZuh us Hkj.kiks"k.k gsrq vkosnu fnukad 22-04-2019 dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj esa izLrqr fd;k gS] tcfd nkEiR; laca/kksa dh iquLFkkZiuk dk nkok vizkFkhZ𝔦 }kjk ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa ,usDpj&2 ds voyksdu ls ckn esa izLrqr gksuk n`f"Vxkspj gksrk gSA tgka rd gLrxr varj.k ;kfpdk dss {ks=kf/kdkj ds fcUnq ij iks"k.kh;rk dk iz'u gS] bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk mi;qZDr m)`r uthj Anshu Bhatnagar v. Rajendra Bhatnagar ds iSjk la[;k&6 esa fuEukafdr fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS %& 6. Even the second contention raised by the learned counsel is bereft of any merit as Section 23 (3) deals with a case where the subordinate courts are subordinate to two different High Courts. Merely because the Rajasthan has a Bench at Jaipur would not bifurcate the High Court and would not divide them into two different High Courts. The High Court continues to be the same although a Bench exists at Jaipur. Therefore, the respondent cannot take the benefit of Section 23 (3) Civil Procedure Code. 3- bl izdkj mi;qZDr uthj esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ds vuqlkj gLrxr varj.k ;kfpdk t;iqj ihB ds le{k iks"k.kh; gSA izkfFkZuh ds vuqlkj mlds nl ekg dh iq=h gSA izkfFkZuh ds ekrk&firk o`) gSaA lhdj ls chdkusj dh nwjh 220 fdyksehVj gSA ,slh ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa iRuh }kjk izR;sd is'kh ij ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa mifLFkr gksdj vius izdj.k dh lqpk: :i ls iSjoh djuk vlqfo/kktud gSA blfy;s gLrxr varj.k ;kfpdk Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr ,oa fof/klEer izrhr gksrk gSA bl laca/k esa izkfFkZuh dh vksj ls izLrqr mi;qZDr m)`r uthj Anshu Bhatnagar v. Rajendra Bhatnagar ds iSjk la[;k&7 esa fuEu er O;Dr fd;k x;k gS %& 7. The Court has to be sensitive to the practical difficulties faced by a woman while traveling especially when she happens to be saddled with the responsibilities of looking after a young child. The Court can neither ignore the concept of gender justice, nor ignore the fact that the woman is entitled to seek justice as much as a man. The petitioner has clearly pointed out that she has to look after a child of three and half years and aged parents about 65 years old. It would be too much for a woman to travel with a young child across the State in order to contest the proceedings which has been initiated by the respondent in the Family Court at Jodhpur. Her inaccessibility to the Court at Jodhpur may deprive her of justice. It would be too much for a woman to travel with a young child across the State in order to contest the proceedings which has been initiated by the respondent in the Family Court at Jodhpur. Her inaccessibility to the Court at Jodhpur may deprive her of justice. 4- dqy feykdj izkfFkZuh dh vksj ls izLrqr varj.k ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 24 lifBr /kkjk 151 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% izkfFkZuh&iRuh dh vksj ls izLrqr varj.k ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 24 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk Lohdkj dj ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj esa yafcr nkEiR; laca/kksa dh iquLFkkZiuk dk nhokuh nkok la[;k&38@2019 'kkfdj gqlSu cuke jsgkuk ckuks dks ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj esa varfjr fd;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] la[;k&1] chdkusj dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd mi;ZDr izdj.k ls lacaf/kr leLr vfHkys[k ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj dks vkxkeh fu;r frfFk ls iwoZ izsf"kr djsA i{kdkjku dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj ds le{k fnukad 05-07-2022 dks mifLFkr jgsaA pwafd nkEiR; laca/kksa dh iquLFkkZiuk dk mDr ekeyk rhu o"kZ ls vf/kd vof/k ls yafcr gS] blfy;s ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;] lhdj dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl izdj.k esa vkxkeh dk;Zokgh fu;ekuqlkj ;FkklEHko 'kh?kz iw.kZ dj izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k ds iz;kl djsA bl vkns'k dh izfr mi;qZDr nksuksa ikfjokfjd U;k;ky;ksa dks izsf"kr dh tk,A