JUDGMENT 1. On 22.03.2022 this Court passed the following order; 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in this writ petition has been considered by the Co-ordinate Bench of this court at Principal seat, Jodhpur in the matter of ’Maya v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.’ (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2076/2022) wherein on 21.02.2022, the following order was passed:- "It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondents have issued the list of candidates, who has been called for document verification without indicating any particulars. Submissions have been made that neither the sports, to which the candidates have been selected, have been indicated nor the marks obtained by the candidates have been disclosed. Further submissions have been made that the candidates, though residence of other States, have also been selected regarding them also no indication has been made. A copy of the writ petition has already been served to Mr. Manish Vyas, AAG, who prays for further time to complete his instructions in the matter. List the petition on 02.03.2022. On that date, the respondents shall produce the entire material pertaining to the order dated 25.01.2022 (Annex.8) issued by the respondents and the procedure, which has been adopted for the purpose of declaring the said list. The respondents may go ahead with the document verification, however, they shall not issue the orders of appointment, till the next date." In that view of the matter, issue notice to the respondents. List on 25.04.2022 along with CW No.1470/2022. Meanwhile, the respondents may go ahead with the document verification, however, they shall not issue the order of appointment, till next date." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the Principal Seat at Jodhpur has finally decided the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2076/2022 (Maya v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.) wherein on 19.04.2022 following order was passed; "This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the Standing Order No.3/2020 dated 18.01.2020 and the provisional selection list dated 25.01.2022 in relation to recruitment of Sports Person to the post of Sub-Inspector/Platoon Commander. The petitioner had questioned the reduction of the marks meant for participation in individual or team event in National Games/Senior National Championship/Open National Athletic Championship/National Inter-State Senior Athletic Championship/ Federation Cup National Senior Championship/ National Cross Country Championship, from 37 as indicated in the advertisement, as per Standing Order dated 18.01.2020 (Annex.3) to 27. In response to the writ petition, the respondents have produced the marks obtained by the petitioner and the cutoff in her category, wherein the petitioner has obtained 42.67 marks and the last selected candidate has obtained 63.33 marks. In that view of the matter, even if the plea raised by the petitioner is accepted and the petitioner is awarded ten more marks, then the petitioner cannot make it to the cutoff. In that view of the matter, the petition filed by the petitioner has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed accordingly." 4. In that view of the matter, the interim order passed by this Court dated 22.03.2022 stands vacated. 5. Counsel for the petitioner seeks two weeks’ time to file rejoinder. Time prayed for is allowed. List on 12.07.2022.