Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 168 (RAJ)

Akash Gujar v. State

2022-01-18

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

body2022
JUDGMENT Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Lawyers are not appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19). 2. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.143/2021, Police Station Hamirgarh, District Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 379, 467, 468, 120B of IPC read with Section 4/21 MMDR act. 3. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material on record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the present case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend the benefit under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to the petitioner. accordingly, the application preferred by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is hereby rejected. 6. However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is ready to surrender before the concerned court, which may consider his bail application on the same day. 7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice, it is directed that if the petitioner akash Gujar S/o Kailas Gujar, surrenders before the trial Court on or before 27/01/2022 and file a bail application there, the Court concerned shall consider his bail application preferably on the same day in accordance with law.