Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1828 (RAJ)

Girdhari Ram v. State

2022-05-31

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

body2022
JUDGMENT Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - This Court perused the material available on record. 2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.161/2021 of Police Station Beechwal, District Bikaner for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of the NDPS act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the contraband in question is below commercial quantity and there are no previous criminal antecedents, pertaining to the offence under the NDPS act against the present petitioner. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor though opposes the bail application, but is unable to refute the aforesaid factual matrix. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Girdhari Ram @ Vinod Kumar S/o Hadmana Ram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.161/2021 of Police Station Beechwal, District Bikaner, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/-each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.