JUDGMENT : By this appeal, the appellant is seeking enhancement of compensation. 2. Brief facts of the case are as under :- On 1st January, 2000, the appellant was going from village Kerwadi to Palam in auto-rickshaw bearing no.MCB-8615 (MH-21-B/3446). Due to rash and negligent driving of the driver of auto-rickshaw, it came to be turtled and the appellant and other passengers sustained several injuries. The offence was registered against the driver of the auto-rickshaw i.e. respondent no.1 herein for rash and negligent driving. The appellant filed claim petition for getting compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Parbhani (For short, “the Tribunal”). The Tribunal has awarded compensation of Rs.30,000/-. Against the said judgment and order this appeal for enhancement. 3. It is contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that the Tribunal has not considered the permanent disability of 17% caused to the appellant. The Tribunal has not properly awarded the amount, hence requested to allow the appeal. 4. It is contention of the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 that the Tribunal has considered the evidence led by the appellant and on that basis the compensation is awarded. The appellant failed to produce necessary documents before the Tribunal, hence the judgment and order passed by the Tribunal is legal and valid. 5. I have heard both the learned counsel. Perused the judgment and order passed by the Tribunal. 6. The issue involved in this appeal is compensation awarded to the appellant. It is contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that though the appellant has sustained 17% permanent disability, the Tribunal has not awarded proper compensation. The appellant has examined Dr. Balasaheb Dattatraya Masare to prove disability certificate. This witness has stated that he examined the appellant and issued certificate Exhibit-19. There was 17% disability suffered by the appellant. It has come on record that the appellant was treated at Government Hospital at Ambajogai whereas the certificate is given by doctor at Parbhani. Doctor has stated that there was muscular shortening and difficulty in squatting. No other medical papers i.e. medical bills for the treatment are produced on record. Hence I am considering 10% disability of the appellant. 7. In view of the above, the appellant is entitle to receive the following amount of compensation :- Sr. No. Head Compensation awarded 1. Monthly income Rs.1800/- per month 2. No other medical papers i.e. medical bills for the treatment are produced on record. Hence I am considering 10% disability of the appellant. 7. In view of the above, the appellant is entitle to receive the following amount of compensation :- Sr. No. Head Compensation awarded 1. Monthly income Rs.1800/- per month 2. Annual income (Rs.1800/- X 12) Rs.21,600/- per year 3. Multiplier of 11 (Rs.21,600/- X 11) Rs.2,37,600/- 4. 10% loss of future earning capacity Rs.23,760/- 5. Non-pecuniary damages as awarded by the Tribunal Rs.30,000/- Total Rs.53,760/- 8. In view of the above, I pass the following order ORDER (i) The appeal is allowed. (ii) The amount of compensation is enhanced from Rs.30,000/- to Rs.53,760/-. Appellant is entitle to enhanced amount of Rs.13,760/- @ 6 % from the date of filing claim petition till realization of amount. (iii) Appeal is disposed of in above terms.