Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 1856 (RAJ)

Ajiz v. State Of Rajasthan

2022-06-14

KULDEEP MATHUR

body2022
JUDGMENT Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 275/2020, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Barmer, for offences under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C, 120B, 201 of Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar set of facts, this Court while deciding S.B. Criminal Misc. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar set of facts, this Court while deciding S.B. Criminal Misc. IIIrd Bail Application No. 6332/2022 (Ramakishan v. State of Rajasthan), has enlarged the co-accused on bail, vide order dated 23.05.2022, and the same is reproduced herein below:- izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dh vksj ls tekur dk ;g r`rh; vkosnu vUrxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfØ;k lafgrk iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh ckM+esj ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 275@2020] vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 8@21 o 29 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu% izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e ds ekeys esa izLrqr gqvk gSA geus cgl tekur vkosnu lquh rFkk miyC/k vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dh vksj ls izLrqr izFke tekur vkosnu vLohdkj djrs oDr tCrh vf/kdkjh o vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds c;ku ds mijkUr tekur dk u;k vkosnu is'k djus dh Lora=rk iznku dh x;h FkhA rRi'pkr xokg jkeizrkiflag ih-MCY;w&1 ds c;ku gks ntZ fd;s tk pqds gS ftlds }kjk tCrh ds mijkUr vuqla/kku Hkh fd;k x;k gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dk dguk gS fd mDr lk{kh ds dFkuksa ds mijkUr ;g izdV gqvk gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dks lg&vfHkqDr egsUnz dqekj dh lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij tqeZ ls tksM+k x;k gS ftlds vuqlkj ;g gsjksbu egsUnz dqekj }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dks lIykbZ dh tkuh FkhA blds vfrfjDr izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr ds fo:) vU; dksbZ lk{; ugha gSA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr us jkeizrkiflag }kjk tkfgj fd;s x;s bu dFkuksa dh vksj U;k;ky; dk /;ku vkdf"kZr fd;k ftlesa lk{kh us bl rF; dks Lohdkj fd;k gS fd jkefd'ku ds f[kykQ /kkjk 27 dh ekSdk rLnhd dh bfryk ds vykok vU; dksbZ lk{; ekStwn ugha gSA izLrqr ekeys esa izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr ls gsjksbu dh cjkenxh ugha gqbZ gSA ;g cjkenxh lg&vfHkqDr ewykjke ls gksuk crk;h x;h gS ftlus viuh lwpuk vUrxZr /kkjk 27 Hkkjrh; lk{; vf/kfu;e esa ;g crk;k gS fd ;g gsjksbu egsUnz dqekj dks lIykbZ dh tkuh FkhA egsUnz dqekj dh vksj ls is'k ,dyihB QkStnkjh fofo/k tekur vkosnu la[;k 1203@2022 fnukad 28-01-2022 dks Lohdkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dk ekeyk lg&vfHkqDr egsUnz dqekj ls vf/kd xaHkhj ugha gS vr% tekur dh izkFkZuk dhA blds foijhr ;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA tekur vkosnu ij fopkj fd;kA ;ksX; vf/koDrkx.k }kjk cgl esa mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk tqeZ dh izd`fr o ifjfLFkfr;ka esa izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr dks bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa tekur ij fjgk fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA vkns'k gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHkqDr jkefd'ku iq= t;fd'ku iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh ckM+esj ftyk ckM+esj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 275@2020 ds ekeys esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa viuh fu;fer mifLFkfr ds laca/k esa ,d yk[k :i;s dk eqpydk ,oa ;ksX; v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekur izLrqr dj rLnhd djk ns rks mls bl izdj.k esa tekur ij rqjar fjgk dj fn;k tkosA 4. The petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner. 5. Learned G.A. cum AAG vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, so also the fact that similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Ajiz @ Ajiya S/o. Shri Variyam arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 275/2020, registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Barmer shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.