JUDGMENT (Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the order passed by the third respondent in Ref.No.O.Mu.No. 11944/AA5/2014 dated 30.03.2015 and quash the same to the extent of cancellation of bonus increment and consequently direct the respondents to sanction the selection grade promotion in the post of B.T. Assistant from 01.10.2008.) 1. The order of rejection dated 30.03.2015, rejecting the claim of the writ petitioner for Selection Grade promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant from 01.10.2008, is under challenge in the present writ petition. 2. The writ petitioner was appointed as Secondary Grade Teacher at Panchayat Union Primary School, Puthupalayam, Cuddalore District, on 14.11.1977. The petitioner states that he continued as a Secondary Grade Teacher for about 30 years continuously and he was stagnated in the said post beyond the period of 30 years. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for stagnation increment/bonus increment as per the Government Order. The petitioner was promoted to the post of B.T. Assistant on 14.07.2008. The petitioner submitted an application for grant of Selection Grade in the post of B.T. Assistant and the said benefit was also not granted. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition. 3. The petitioner Mr.V.Ramamoorthy was originally appointed as Secondary Grade Assistant and his services were regularised from 14.11.1977. He was consequently awarded Selection Grade and Special Grade in the cadre of Secondary Grade Teacher as on 14.11.1987 and 14.11.1997 respectively by the Chief Educational Officer, Cuddalore. Considering his qualifications and seniority, the petitioner was promoted to the post of B.T. Assistant (History) during the year 2001-2002, which he willingly relinquished temporarily for three years on 21.01.2002. Therefore, the petitioner cannot be treated as a stagnated employee. 4. An employee can be treated as stagnated employee if no promotion was granted to him. However, in the present case, the petitioner was granted promotion in the year 2001-2002 to the post of B.T. Assistant (History) and he had relinquished the promotion temporarily for the period of three years on 21.01.2002. An employee who relinquished the opportunity of promotion, cannot be treated as stagnated employee for the purpose of grant of bonus increment fixation or grant of Selection Grade in the post of B.T. Assistant. An employee who relinquished the opportunity of promotion, cannot be treated as stagnated employee for the purpose of grant of bonus increment fixation or grant of Selection Grade in the post of B.T. Assistant. However, the petitioner availed the subsequent opportunity of chance of promotion and accepted the post of B.T. Assistant on 14.07.2008 and he retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.07.2010. 5. The petitioner claimed Selection Grade to the post of B.T. Assistant. He has not completed 10 years of service in the post of B.T. Assistant. He has relinquished his promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant in the year 2001-2002 for a period of three years by submitting an application on 31.01.2002. Therefore, he was not considered as a stagnated employee in the post of Secondary Grade Teacher on account of the fact that he relinguished his opportunity of promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant. 6. The petitioner himself has stated that he is continuously receiving the benefits of bonus increment. As per the judgment of this Court dated in WP No.22206 of 20098.2011, he was granted excess amount, which was sanctioned on erroneous basis. However, the said amount was not recovered from the petitioner and he is still enjoying the benefit. The erroneous sanction of bonus increment was not cancelled on account of the orders passed by this Court. 7. The petitioner, in the meanwhile not only withholding an excess increment, which is not rightfully his, as if it was not enough, the petitioner had approached the third respondent through the Headmaster wanting the Award of Selection Grade in the post of B.T. Assistant. The petitioner wants this Selection Grade by way of counting his services rendered in the lower post of Special Grade Secondary Grade Assistant from 01.10.1988 to 13.07.2008 (9 years, 9 months and 13 days) with the promotional post of B.T. Assistant services rendered from 14.07.2008 to 30.09.2008 (2 months and 17 days of B.T. Assistant Service) as per G.O.Ms.No.210, P&AR (S) Department, dated 11.03.1987 and Government Letter Ms.No.168, P&AR (S) Department, dated 28.09.1999. In the above Government Order and other Government letters, orders had been issued to the effect that the services rendered in the Selection Grade/Special Grade of the lower post shall be counted for awarding Selection Grade in the higher post, if the scale of pay of the Selection Grade/Special Grade of the lower post was identical or higher than that of the higher post. 8. In the revised pay scales implemented with effect from 01.01.2006 as per the VI Pay Commission G.O.Ms.No.234, Finance (PC) Department, dated 01.06.2009, only one increment equal to 3% of the Basic Pay and Grade Pay in the same pay band is allowed in the revised pay scale for Award of Selection/Special Grade. The petitioner has come over to the revised pay scale on 01.01.2006. The Government has issued clarification vide Government Letter No.63305/Pay Cell/2010-1, Finance (PC) Department, dated 08.11.2010, in which it was categorically stated that Government Servants having identical/higher scale of pay in the lower post than their promotional post between 01.01.2006 to 31.05.2009 could be awaded Selection/Special Grade when they give option to come over to the revised pay scale on the date of Selection/Special Grade, whereas the petitioner did not give any such option in terms of the Award of Selection Grade. 9. In view of the facts and circumstances, the petitioner cannot be considered as a stagnated employee, as he relinquished his promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant in the year 2001-2002. But he availed the further opportunity of promotion to the post of B.T. Assistant and joined on 14.07.2008 and retired from service on 31.07.2010. Thus, the petitioner had not completed 10 yeqars of service in the post of B.T. Assistant and therefore, he cannot claim the relief of Selection Grade to the post of B.T. Assistant. As far as the bonus increment was concerned, the said benefit was not withdrawn and the petitioner pursuant to the orders of this Court, is still enjoying the benefits. 10.This being the factum established, the petitioner is not entitled any further relief, as such, sought for in the present writ petition. 11. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.