Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 2625 (BOM)

Bhagyashree v. State of Maharashtra

2022-12-19

M.W.CHANDWANI, SUNIL B.SHUKRE

body2022
JUDGMENT Sunil B. Shukre, J. - Heard Mr. Ghate, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Joshi, learned Additional Government Pleader, who appears by waiving notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is only pressing an alternate prayer which is about issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation and this is the reason that we are not issued any notice to respondent No.3. 4. Considering the nature of the alternate prayer made in the Petition, we are of the view that this Petition can be partly allowed and it is allowed accordingly. 5. We direct respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, as expeditious as possible, in any case within two weeks from the date of receipt of the order. Rule made absolute in the above terms. No costs.