Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 2642 (BOM)

Parvez Azizbhai Opai v. State of Maharashtra

2022-12-20

M.W.CHANDWANI, SUNIL B.SHUKRE

body2022
JUDGMENT Sunil B.Shukre, J. - Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The applicants and non applicant No.2 have reached an amicable settlement in terms of the compromise pursis filed on record which is marked as 'A' for identification. They are personally present before the Court and are identified by their respective counsel. They state that due to mediation efforts, they have amicably settled their dispute in between them and all the terms and conditions thereof are acceptable to them. They also submit that they have decided to bury their differences and they wish to live harmonious and peaceful life in future. 4. We are satisfied about the voluntary nature of the compromise reached between the parties. It also shows that underlying the criminal cases registered against the applicants at the behest of non-applicant No.2 there is a private dispute therefore, this is a fit case for quashing and setting aside the criminal proceedings by invoking the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under. ''a. Quash and set aside the FIR and Charge sheet registered in the present matter vide charge sheet No.637 of 2014 registered with the Police Station, Jaripatka, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Section under 294,506,323,427,34 of I.P.C,in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case stated hereinabove and in the interest of justice'. 5. This order is subject to the condition that the applicants shall deposit an amount of Rs.5,000/- and non-applicant No.2 shall deposit an amount of Rs.5,000/- as costs in the account of the Office of the Government Pleader, High Court Bombay, Bench at Nagpur so as to form part of the library fund, for the purpose of development of library within a period of two weeks from the date of the order, failing which the Registry shall treat the costs so imposed upon the respective parties as fines imposed by this Court and shall proceed to recover the same in accordance with law. 6. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.