JUDGMENT : RAJESH SHANKAR, J. 1. The case is taken up through Video Conferencing. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the District Administration, Ranchi to take appropriate steps for restraining the heirs of Late Sukra Pahan and Late Bhikha Pahan from forcibly grabbing the petitioner’s land appertaining to Khata No. 316, R.S. Plot No. 964, Municipal Holding No. 8, Ward No. 29, measuring an area of 3 Katthas, which was purchased by her from one Badal Khan S/o Late Chedi Khansama by virtue of registered sale-deed No. 8841 dated 26.08.1985. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner while referring to the order dated 20.08.2018 passed by this Court in W.P. (C) No. 225/2003 [Ajay Kumar Sinha and Others vs. State of Jharkhand and Others] submits that this Court has decided the issue with regard to the land under the same Khata and Plot in favour of the purchasers and against the original Raiyats (Tribal)/their heirs by setting aside different orders passed by the Special Officer as well as appellate and revisional authorities and as such the heirs of Late Sukra Pahan and Late Bhikha Pahan should be restrained by the District Administration, Ranchi from forcibly taking possession of the said land from the petitioner in the garb of the provisions of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Act, 1908). 4. The petitioner has not stated in the present writ petition as to whether any case under Section 71A of the Act, 1908 has been instituted against her by the heirs of the original Raiyats and therefore there is no occasion for this Court to entertain the aforesaid prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition. It is upon the SAR Court as well as appellate and revisional authorities to consider particular case filed before them on the basis of the given facts and law. 5. The present writ petition is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid observation.