JUDGMENT : MANOJ KUMAR VYAS, J. 1. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that the petitioner vide order dated 30.09.2021 was transferred from Government Senior Secondary School, Bhandana to Government Senior Secondary School Jatwara, Dausa. The said order was challenged by the petitioner before the Tribunal by way of filing the appeal No. 4888/2021 and the learned Tribunal was pleased to stay the operation of transfer order dated 30.09.2021 on 26.10.2021, clearly giving finding that there has been violation of Rule 17(1) of the TA/DA Rules, 1971. 2. It is further submitted that after passing of the stay order, the petitioner joined again at Bhandana. During the pendency of stay order in Appeal No. 4888/2021, the petitioner vide transfer order dated 07.01.2022 was again transferred to the same place where he was transferred by way of earlier transfer order dated 30.09.2021. The petitioner was relieved on the same day (07.01.2022). The impugned transfer order dated 07.01.2022 was again challenged before the Tribunal by way of filing the appeal No. 86/2022. The learned Tribunal vide order dated 18.01.2022 rejected the appeal without considering and appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case and legal position involved in the appeal. Hence, this writ petition with following prayer: “It is, therefore humbly prayed that Your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and after summoning the entire record pertaining to this from the Tribunal: (i) By an appropriate writ order or direction the impugned judgment dated 18.01.2022 (Annexure-1) passed by the Ld. Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur in Appeal No. 86/2022 titled as Roopnarayan Kuldeep vs. State of Rajasthan and Others, may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) By an appropriate writ order of direction the Appeal No. 86/2022 (Annexure-2) filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed as prayed for thereby setting aside the transfer order dated 07.01.2022 and the relieving order dated 07.01.2022 (Annexure-1 and 2 of the Appeal). (iii) Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing. 4. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner was initially transferred vide order dated 30.09.2021 from Government Senior Secondary School, Bhandana (Dausa) to Government Senior Secondary School Jatwara, Dausa. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing. 4. A perusal of the record reveals that the petitioner was initially transferred vide order dated 30.09.2021 from Government Senior Secondary School, Bhandana (Dausa) to Government Senior Secondary School Jatwara, Dausa. The petitioner preferred an appeal against this transfer order dated 30.09.2021 and the learned Tribunal vide order dated 26.10.2021 passed the order staying the operation of transfer order dated 30.09.2021 and following observation was made: ^^vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us ;g rdZ fn;k gS fd vihykFkhZ lhfu;j Vhpj xzsM&r`rh; ¼xf.kr½ ds in ij jktdh; mPp ek/;fed fo|ky;] Hk.Mkuk ftyk&nkSlk] esa dk;Zjr gSA vihykFkhZ dk vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 30-09-2021 ¼vuqyXu&1½ ds }kjk mldk LFkkukUrj.k jktdh; mPp ek/;fed fo|ky;] tVokM+k ftyk&nkSlk] fd;k x;k gSA vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk ;g dguk gS fd vihykFkhZ us vihy esa vkyksP; vkns'k dks pqukSrh nsrs gq, e[; vk/kkj ysrs gq, ;g vuqjks/k fd;k fd vkyksP; vkns'k ;k=k HkRrk fu;e] 1971 ds fu;e 17¼1½ ds ifjf'k"V dh vH;qfDr la[;k 4 ds vkKkid Áko/kkuksa ds fo:) gksus ds dkj.k vikLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA vr% vihy vihykFkhZ Lohdkj dj vkyksP; vkns'k tks fd fof/k fo:) gS] dks vihykFkhZ dh lhek rd LFkfxr djrs gq, ÁR;FkhZx.k dks uksfVlst tkjh fd, tkosA LFkxu ÁkFkZuk i= ij ;g varfje vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fooknxzLr vkyksP; fnukad 30-09-2021 ¼vuqyXud&1½ dk fØ;kUo;u vihykFkhZ dks inLFkkiu ds laca/k esa vf/kdj.k ds vkxkeh vkns'k rd LFkfxr jgsxk ,oa lkFk gh ;g Li”V fd;k tkrk gS fd vihykFkhZ dks ogha dk;Zjr j[kk tkos tgka ij og pqukSrh vkns'k ikfjr fd;s tkus ls iwoZ dk;Zjr FkhA ;gka ;g Hkh Li”V fd;k tkrk gS fd ÁR;FkhZ fOkHkkx u;s fljs ls fu;ekuqlkj LFkkukUrj.k djus gsrq Lora= gS rFkk ,sls LFkkukUrj.k ij mDr LFkxu vkns'k ck/kd ugha jgsxkA** 5. The petitioner was again transferred to the same place vide order dated 07.01.2022. The petitioner challenged his second transfer order dated 07.01.2022. The petitioner was again transferred to the same place vide order dated 07.01.2022. The petitioner challenged his second transfer order dated 07.01.2022. The learned Tribunal vide order dated 18.01.2022 dismissed appeal of the petitioner and following observations were made in the impugned order dated 18.01.2022 (Annexure-1): ^^vkns'k fnukad 30-09-2021 ¼vuqyXud&3½ }kjk vihykFkhZ dk LFkkukUrj.k jktdh; mPp ek/;fed fo|ky;] Hk.Mkuk] ftjksrk[kqnZ nkSlk ls jktdh; mPp ek/;fed fo|ky;] tVokM+k] ftyk nkSlk esa fd;k x;k] ftls ;k=k HkRrk fu;e 1971 ds fu;e 17¼1½ ds ifjf'k"V dh vH;qfDr la[;k 4 ds vkKkid Áko/kkuksa ds fo:} gksus ds dkj.k vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr varfje LFkxu vkns'k fnukad 26-10-2021 ¼vuqyXud&4½ }kjk mDr vkns'k fnukad 30-09-2021 dks vf/kdj.k ds vkxkeh vkns'k rd LFkfxr dj fn;k x;kA ml vkns'k esa ÁR;FkhZ foHkkx dks ;g NwV Ánku dh x;h fd ÁR;FkhZ foHkkx u;s fljs ls fu;ekuqlkj LFkkukUrj.k djus ds fy;s Lora= gksxkA ÁR;FkhZ foHkkx ds }kjk tkjh vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 07-01-2022 ¼vuqyXud&1½ }kjk vihykFkhZ dks ;k=k HkRrk ,oa ;ksxdky ns; fd;k x;k gSA mDr vkns'k esa vf/kdj.k }kjk tkjh vkns'k fnukad 26-10-2021 ¼vuqyXud&4½ dh vogsyuk nf'kZr ugha gS vkSj u gh blesa dksbZ nqHkkZouk gSA ;k+=k HkRrk ,oa ;ksxdky ugha nsus ds vk/kkj ij fu;e fo:) vkns'k ekudj iwoZ LFkkukUrj.k vkns'k dks varfje vkns'k tkjh dj vf/kdj.k ds vkxkeh vkns'k rd LFkfxr fd;k x;k FkkA bl vkns'k esa ÁR;FkhZx.k dks fu;ekuqdwy uohu vkns'k tkjh djus dh NwV Ánku dh x;h FkhA mlh mUeqfDr ds vuq:i mDr uohu vkns'k ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA vr% bls fof/k fo:) ugha dgk tk ldrkA vkyksP; vkns'k fnukad 07-01-2022 ¼vuqyXud&1 o 2½ fu;e fo:) gks vFkok vl{ke Ákf/kdkjh }kjk tkjh fd;s x;s gks] ,slk vkns’k ls nf'kZr ugha gSA fdlh Ádkj dh dksbZ nqHkkZouk Hkh bl vkns'k ls ÁdV ugha gks jgh gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vkyksP; LFkkukUrj.k vkns'k esa gLr{ksi djus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA vr% mi;qZDr foospukuqlkj vihy e; LFkxu ÁkFkZuk i=] lkjghu ,oa cyghu gksus ds dkj.k xzkg;rk ds ÁØe ij gh ,rn}kjk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA** 6. A perusal of the impugned order of learned Tribunal dated 18.01.2022 makes the position clear that earlier the transfer order of the petitioner was stayed by an interim order, however, it was clearly mentioned in earlier order of the learned Tribunal dated 26.10.2021 but the respondents were given liberty to pass order afresh after complying with the relevant rules (Travelling Allowances Rules, 1971). Thus, the second transfer order dated 07.01.2022 passed by the respondents was held to be as per rules and as per the liberty granted by the learned Tribunal in its earlier order dated 26.10.2021. 7. In view thereof, the order of learned Tribunal dated 18.01.2022 is just and proper. No ground for any interference is made out. 8. The writ petition is devoid of any merit and is liable to be dismissed. 9. Writ Petition dismissed. 10. Stay application also stands dismissed.