JUDGMENT (Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for records relating to the First Information Report in crime No.596 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police and to quash the same.) 1. This petition has been filed to quash the F.I.R. in crime No.596 of 2021 registered by the respondent police for offences under Sections 8 & 9 of Tamilnadu Gaming Act, 1930, as against the petitioner. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 07.10.2021, the respondent received information that without getting prior approval from the Government, gambling was played in Youth Recreation Club by using cards. On such information, the respondent and its team entered into the club premises at evening and found that A1 to A11 by sitting in a round table with 52 cards, were playing cards illegally with money. The twelfth accused is the President of Youth Recreation Club, who permitted such gambling in the club. The respondent also seized 52 cards and a sum of Rs.30,000/- from the mahazar, etc. All the accused persons were arrested and remanded to judicial custody. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is arrayed as A12 and he is the President of Youth Recreation Club registered under Tamilnadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. The club was commenced on 02.11.2011 and was functioning as Youth Recreation Club. The members of the club are reputed persons in the Society and most of them are business entrepreneurs and professionals in various fields. The club is also having indoor and outdoor games for its members including such as table tennis, carrom, chess, billiards, etc and also outdoor games. Along with other indoor games, members of the club also used to play rummy. In fact, in the year 2011, the respondent summoned the executive members of the club and warned not to allow the members of the club to play rummy. Therefore, the club was constrained to file writ petition in WP.No.26391 of 2011, in which this Court disposed of the same, thereby issued direction that the respondent shall not interfere with the day to day activities of the petitioner's club except on the specific complaint alleging any illegal conduct. The club at any point of time has not involved in any illegal activities like gambling. The club at any point of time has not involved in any illegal activities like gambling. In spite of the order passed by this Court, the present FIR has been foisted as against the petitioner and others. 4. The learned Government Advocate(crl.side) submitted that already investigation was completed and filed final report. 5. Heard, Mr.M.Guruprasad, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate(crl.side) appearing for the respondent. 6. Even after filing the final report, quashment of FIR is maintainable. It is relevant to rely upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Pandiyarajan and Ors Vs. State and Ors reported in 2020 1 MLJ (cri) 578, in which the Madurai Bench of this Court held as follows: 10. It has been repeatedly held that running of a common gaming house is a primordial requisite before a person could be convicted for an offence under Sections 8 and 9 of the Act and gaming is not an offence per se. Even assuming that the allegations putforth by the prosecution is true, it cannot be constituted an offence as alleged by the prosecution. In these circumstances, even if the prosecution is allowed to continue, in view of the facts and circumstance of the case, it would be a futile exercise and there is no scope for conviction. Therefore, the materials collected in support of the charges do not disclose the commission of any of the offence or make out a case against the petitioners/accused and as such, the entire criminal proceedings cannot be sustained. 11. Further, in this case, there is absolutely no mention in the report about anybody running a common gaming house. There is no mention about the first petitioner permitting the use of the premises for gaming activities with a view to derive profit or gain for himself. Therefore, the place in which the petitioners played in vettu cheetu and recovered huge sum by the respondents is not a common gaming house. Time and again, this Court has pointed out that gaming is not an offence per se but it is punishable only when it is carried on in a public place for commercialisation purpose and in a common gaming house with profit motive as contemplated under the Gaming Act. Time and again, this Court has pointed out that gaming is not an offence per se but it is punishable only when it is carried on in a public place for commercialisation purpose and in a common gaming house with profit motive as contemplated under the Gaming Act. However, the law enforcing agencies ignoring the marked differences between play of games in a house or club and gaming activities carried in a common gaming house indulge in endless prosecution merely harass the innocent. ...........” (vi) In the case on hand, admittedly, the respondents recovered money on the table and it is not sufficient to throw any light as to the club or the secretary of the club deriving anything from out of the money available on the table at the relevant point of time. The members playing cards making profit is not at all a criterion to decide the question of the premises being used as gaming house. Therefore, it is not sufficient to consider the premises of the club is a common gaming house as defined under Section 3 of the Act. 7. In the case on hand, there is absolutely no mention about anybody running common gaming cards and there is no mention about the petitioner permitting the use of the premises for gaming activities with a view to derive profit or gain for the club. Therefore, no offence is made is made out under Tamilnadu Gaming Act, 1930 as alleged by the respondent. 8. In view of the above, the impugned FIR in crime No.596 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police registered for the offences under Sections 8 & 9 of Tamilnadu Gaming Act, 1930 and its consequential proceedings such as final report, is quashed and this criminal original petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.