Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 33 (MP)

Deepak Bansal v. State of Madhya Pradesh

2022-01-06

RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA

body2022
JUDGMENT Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - Present second criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14-(a)(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 against the order dated 29/09/2021 passed by Special Judge (atrocities act), Gwalior (M.P.), whereby the application of the appellant under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking bail has been rejected. The appellant has been arrested on 06/09/2021 in connection with Crime No.66/2021 registered at Police Station Padao, District Gwalior, punishable under Sections 420, 406, 294, 506 of IPC, Sections 3(1)(da)(dha), 3(2)(Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant- Deepak Bansal that the appellant has not committed any offence. He has falsely been implicated in the case. appellant is in custody since 06/09/2021, i.e. for around four months. It is further submitted that appellant is innocent. There is no overt act on the part of the present appellant. It is also submitted that no case against the appellant is made out under Sections 3(1)(da)(dha), 3(2)(Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act. This is second criminal appeal for grant of bail to the appellant. Earlier appeal was rejected on merits. Thereafter, the change circumstance is the recording of evidence of complainant - ashish Choudhary, wherein he has specifically stated that all the amount has been returned back to him by giving post dated cheques, therefore no criminal liability arose against the present appellant. It is further submitted that as per order-sheet dated 24/12/2021 of trial Court, parties are arrived at compromise and compromise has already been accepted by the trial Court and present appellant has been acquitted from the charges under Sections 406, 420, 506 of IPC. as Section 294 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(da)(dha), 3(2) (Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act, are not compoundable, therefore trial is going on for aforesaid Sections. Trial will take its own time. appellant is ready to abide by any condition which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prayed to grant bail to the appellant. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the appeal and has submitted that earlier appeal filed for grant of bail to the appellant was considered and rejected on merits by this Court. Trial will take its own time. appellant is ready to abide by any condition which may be imposed by this Court. Hence, prayed to grant bail to the appellant. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the appeal and has submitted that earlier appeal filed for grant of bail to the appellant was considered and rejected on merits by this Court. Thereafter, there is no changed circumstances under which this second criminal appeal for grant of bail could be considered. Hence, prayed to reject this repeat second bail application of the appellant. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the case diary and documents available on record. It is apparent from the perusal of documents available on record that compromise has taken place between the parties which is on record and trial Court has acquitted the appellant from the charges under Sections 406, 420, 506 of IPC. as Section 294 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(da)(dha), 3(2)(Va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) act, are not compoundable, therefore trial is going on for aforesaid Sections. Remaining trial will take its own time. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case as well as arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the present appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 29/09/2021 passed by the Special Judge (atrocities act) Gwalior (M.P.) is quashed by directing that the appellant be released on his furnishing personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned for his regular appearance before the trial Court concerned on the dates fixed by it. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the appellant :- 1. The appellant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him; 2. The appellant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be; 3. The appellant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4. The appellant shall not commit any kind of offence. The appellant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be; 4. The appellant shall not commit any kind of offence. In case of commission of any kind of offence, this bail order shall automatically stand cancelled; 5. The appellant will not move in the vicinity of complainant party and applicant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; 6. The appellant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be. It is made clear that this bail order will be subject to encashment of post dated cheques which have been given on behalf the appellant to the complainant of this case. This appeal stands disposed of in above terms. Let a copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for compliance. Certified copy/ e-copy as per rules/directions.