Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 359 (UTT)

Govind Nath v. State of Uttarakhand

2022-11-01

SANJAYA KUMAR MISHRA, VIPIN SANGHI

body2022
JUDGMENT : VIPIN SANGHI, J. Miscellaneous applications (IA Nos.13152 of 2021 and 13153 of 2021) are allowed, and the counter-affidavit filed by respondent no.1 and rejoinder-affidavit to the counter-affidavit of respondent no.1 are taken on record. 2. Petitioner, admittedly, is a public servant. The reliefs sought in the writ petition are as follows:- “I. Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the order dated 10.01.2020 (Annexure No.1) passed by the respondent no.1. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to prepare the pension paper of the petitioner and pay him pension regularly and pay the other retiral dues with 18% interest calculating his entire service from 14.12.1979. III. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to pay the amount forcibly recovered from the petitioner’s salary of the month September and October, 2018 without any notice to him. IV. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances in nature of justice and equity.” 3. The said reliefs squarely fall for consideration within the jurisdiction of the Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal. 4. Since the pleadings are complete, we direct the Registry to transmit the record of the present writ petition to the Tribunal forthwith to be registered as a claim petition. 5. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.