Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 368 (UTT)

Salman v. State of Uttarakhand

2022-12-02

RAVINDRA MAITHANI

body2022
JUDGMENT Ravindra Maithani, J. - Since all these bail applications arise from one and the same FIR, they are being decided by this common order. 2. Applicants Salman, Taiyyab and Waseem are in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.99 of 2022, under Sections 8/21/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Buggawala, District Haridwar. They have sought their release on bail. 3. According to the FIR, on 17.09.2022, 10 grams Smack was recovered from co-accused Sahib. It is the case of the prosecution that Sahib revealed that he got the material from Salman, who procured it from Taiyyab. It is also the case when the co-accused Sahib was intercepted, he was pillion rider in a motorcycle driven by the applicant Waseem. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. It is argued that nothing was recovered from the applicants. There is no legally admissible evidence, which may connect the applicant with the co-accused Sahib, merely based on the statement of co-accused Sahib, they have been implicated. 6. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that these are the cases fit for bail and the applicants deserve to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail applications are allowed. 8. Let the applicants be released on bail, on their executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.