JUDGMENT Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - The hearing of the case is being held through video conferencing on account of restricted functioning of the Courts. 2. Through this revision petition, the landlord assails the correctness of the order passed by the learned Rent Controller on 19.11.2019. 3. A petition filed under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, seeking eviction of the respondents filed in the year 2008, is still pending. The petitioner's opportunity to lead further evidence was closed on 20.11.2013. Thereafter, on an application for recall of order dated 20.11.2013, the learned Rent Controller permitted the petitioner to lead further evidence vide an order dated 08.01.2014. The petitioner tendered affidavit in lieu of examination-in-chief and was cross-examined on two different occasions. However, subsequently in the revision petition, the order dated 08.01.2014 was stayed and, thereafter, it was set aside on 09.05.2019. Now, the Court has dismissed the application for recall of the order dated 20.11.2013 and has refused to grant any permission to thepetitioner to lead any evidence. It has been noticed that the petitioner claiming to be a Non-resident Indian (NRI), has filed the petition on the ground of bona fide personal necessity. The petition remains pending for a period of 14 years. 4. After arguing at some length, the learned counsel after taking instructions from the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the main eviction petition with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause of action. 5. Per contra, the learned counsel representing the respondents failed to draw the attention of the Court to any legal impediment in the same. 6. Moreover, if the bona fide requirement of the landlord continues, the landlord has a recurring cause of action. 7. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the revision petition is disposed of while granting liberty to the petitioner to withdraw the eviction petition filed under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, with liberty to file fresh one on the same cause of action. 8. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of.