Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2022 DIGILAW 469 (UTT)

Kartik v. State of Uttarakhand

2022-12-23

RAVINDRA MAITHANI

body2022
JUDGMENT Ravindra Maithani, J. - Applicant Kartik is in judicial custody in FIR No. 1093 of 2022 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 336, 352 IPC, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the co-accused Harsh Chauhan and Rishi Parihar, who were arrested from the spot and from whom some firearms were allegedly recovered have already been granted bail by the Sessions Court. It is also argued that the co-accused Anshul Yadav, whose role is similar to that of the applicant has also been granted bail by the Sessions Court. 4. At the time of hearing of the bail application, bail orders of co-accused Anshul Yadav, Harsh Chauhan and Rishi Parihar have been tendered by the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. 5. Learned State counsel admits it. 6. Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.